On August 10, 2023, XRP briefly reached an astonishing price of $50 on the Gemini exchange, despite trading near $0.63 across the broader crypto market. At the time, many retail traders dismissed the event as a technical malfunction or charting error.
However, crypto enthusiast Ledger Man recently revisited the incident and argued that the move was not a software glitch, but a genuine market execution caused by extreme illiquidity and severe slippage.
The event occurred shortly after Gemini reopened XRP trading following Judge Analisa Torres’ July 2023 ruling that programmatic XRP sales on public exchanges did not constitute securities transactions. The decision triggered a wave of XRP relistings across U.S.-based exchanges, and Gemini’s launch of XRP spot trading attracted immediate market attention.
According to Ledger Man, the now-infamous candle exposed deeper structural weaknesses within newly opened crypto markets and demonstrated how thin liquidity can produce extreme price distortions within seconds.
🚨The infamous $50 XRP candle on Gemini in 2023 wasn’t just a glitch — it was caused by extreme illiquidity and massive slippage. pic.twitter.com/JfFtjqijQu
— Ledger Man 🎩 (@strivex_) May 24, 2026
How a Thin Order Book Allowed XRP to Reach $50
The explanation behind the sudden spike centers on market depth and the mechanics of order execution. When Gemini launched XRP trading, market makers had not yet fully funded accounts or deployed sufficient automated liquidity systems. As a result, the exchange’s sell-side order book remained unusually shallow.
Analysts noted that it initially took only around $37,000 in trading volume to move XRP’s price significantly higher on Gemini. This revealed how fragile the market structure was in the first hours of trading.
The situation escalated when a buyer reportedly submitted a large market order. Unlike a limit order, a market order purchases assets immediately at the best available prices. Because there were very few sell orders between XRP’s prevailing market value and much higher price levels, the order rapidly consumed available liquidity.
The trade swept through sell orders at prices near $0.63, $1, and even several dollars higher before eventually matching with a resting limit sell order placed at $50. That transaction was officially printed on Gemini’s order book, making the $50 candle a legitimate execution event rather than a visual error.
Slippage, Liquidity, and the Fast Correction
Ledger Man’s commentary emphasized the role of catastrophic slippage in the incident. Slippage refers to the difference between the expected execution price of a trade and the actual executed price. In highly liquid markets, slippage remains minimal. In thin markets, however, even moderate orders can trigger violent price swings.
The XRP candle corrected almost immediately because arbitrage traders and automated bots quickly identified the pricing imbalance. As fresh sell orders entered the market near global spot prices, XRP rapidly returned to normal trading levels.
Gemini later adjusted historical chart displays, flattening the spike and causing many observers to believe the move had been purely graphical. However, supporters of the liquidity-event thesis maintain that the transaction itself genuinely occurred on the exchange.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Why the Event Still Matters for Institutional Crypto Adoption
Ledger Man also connected the Gemini incident to broader discussions surrounding institutional crypto infrastructure. The event demonstrated how fragile public exchange liquidity can become when large orders interact with shallow books.
Analysts argue that if relatively small retail-sized trades could trigger such an extreme move, large-scale institutional transfers involving billions of dollars would require significantly deeper liquidity systems. This concern becomes especially relevant in discussions surrounding Ripple’s cross-border payment ambitions and On-Demand Liquidity services.
The Gemini XRP candle ultimately highlighted a critical issue facing the digital asset industry: large-scale adoption cannot rely solely on thin public order books. Institutions may require dedicated liquidity pools or far greater market depth to avoid destabilizing price swings during high-volume transactions.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
