The post presents the remarks as direct and forceful, emphasizing disagreements over regulatory approaches and their potential consequences for the crypto industry.

The tweet quotes Hoskinson as comparing Garlinghouse to Gary Gensler and accuses him of supporting a legislative effort that could harm the industry. It also describes the situation as an escalating divide between supporters of different digital assets, particularly ADA and XRP, while asking followers to choose sides.

Charles Hoskinson just went NUCLEAR on Brad Garlinghouse:

"Brad is the new Gary Gensler… This bill f*cks the whole industry! FCK ALL OF US!"#Ripple CEO selling out crypto for $XRP?

ADA vs XRP war just went thermonuclear

Who's side are you on? #CryptoCivilWar https://t.co/2FqhwQRubh pic.twitter.com/qOmi7yn9qs

— ᙢinus ᙡells (@MinusWells) April 14, 2026

Hoskinson Explains His Position on Accountability

In the attached video, Hoskinson explains that he holds individuals accountable when their actions could create lasting consequences for the crypto ecosystem. He states that discussions in the space have become highly polarized, making it difficult for people to engage with arguments without reacting emotionally.

Hoskinson emphasizes that his criticism is based on Garlinghouse’s actions rather than personal intent. He claims that the proposed bill, “Clarity Act,” would classify digital assets as securities by default unless proven otherwise. According to him, this approach reflects regulatory practices previously associated with Gensler and could create serious challenges for new projects.

He argues that such a policy would allow certain entities to obtain exemptions while limiting competition for others. In his view, this creates an uneven environment that could affect how innovation develops within the industry.

Concerns About Developer Liability

Hoskinson also raises concerns about the removal of protections for decentralized finance developers. He warns that the bill could expose developers to what he describes as unlimited liability, where individuals may be held responsible for how unknown third parties use their code.

He questions how developers working on open-source software would be protected under such conditions. Hoskinson states that holding developers accountable for external use cases could discourage participation and slow development across the sector.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Community Responses Highlight Division

The post includes a response from an X user, Third Eye XRP, who challenges Hoskinson’s position. The user refers to calls for regulatory action regarding Ripple and XRP and argues that current developments reflect earlier decisions.

This exchange suggests disagreement among crypto community members, especially regarding regulation and competition. Minus Wells’ post presents Hoskinson’s remarks in a confrontational tone, encouraging continued debate among users on X.

As reactions continue to emerge, the situation reflects clear divisions within the crypto space, with influential figures expressing opposing views on policies that could affect the direction of digital assets.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Charles Hoskinson Goes Nuclear on Ripple CEO, XRP Army Reacts appeared first on Times Tabloid.

The discussion centers on what happens when Bitcoin loses its top position. Squire linked this directly to XRP’s past performance. XRP surpassed Ethereum by market cap in 2018. He presented that moment as evidence that shifts at the top trigger immediate reactions across the industry. Hoskinson’s comments provide the foundation for that view.

MARKET WAR EXPOSED

Charles Hoskinson drops a brutal truth. The moment any asset flips Bitcoin, everything changes. $XRP already flipped Ethereum in 2018… and the attacks on Ripple started instantly.

This was never about rules. It was survival. pic.twitter.com/X7h0R6JHVg

— John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) April 7, 2026

Bitcoin’s Value Tied to Scale

Hoskinson explained that Bitcoin’s strength comes from its size and adoption. He stated, “The only reason Bitcoin is valuable is it’s big.” He emphasized that user perception and network effects sustain that position. He then outlined the consequences of a change at the top. “The minute that some other asset comes along that flips it… Bitcoin dies.”

He believes that a competing asset can match Bitcoin’s monetary design while offering more advanced capabilities. XRP fits that role, and experts have predicted that it can flip Bitcoin. That creates a strong incentive for capital to move.

Institutions Prioritize Yield and Efficiency

Hoskinson addressed how institutions approach digital assets. He made it clear that returns drive decisions. “If I can have an ETF that pays a 3% dividend, I’m going to get more investors.”

This makes yield a key factor. He also described how Bitcoin can operate on other networks to generate that yield. This shifts attention toward ecosystems that support programmability and financial products. Platforms that enable these features gain an advantage.

XRP Aligns With Utility-Driven Demand

Squire’s framing places XRP within this evolving structure. XRP focuses on cross-border payments, liquidity, and fast settlement. These capabilities align with the type of utility Hoskinson described.

Its previous position as the second-largest cryptocurrency remains relevant. XRP showed it can compete at scale. That event supports the idea that rankings can change when a more functional asset gains traction.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Ripple continues to expand XRP’s presence in global payment corridors. This strengthens the digital asset’s role in a system that values efficiency and real-world application.

Market Direction Favors Functional Assets

Hoskinson also pointed to a future where Bitcoin moves across networks to access additional financial opportunities. This creates a layered ecosystem where utility plays a central role. Assets built for integration and transaction flow stand to benefit from this structure.

Squire’s post and Hoskinson’s remarks align on a clear outcome. Market leadership depends on adoption, functionality, and capital flow. XRP fits perfectly due to its established utility.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Drops a Brutal Bitcoin Truth, XRP Army Reacts appeared first on Times Tabloid.

In the post, Xaif Crypto asserts that Bitcoin’s dominance is vulnerable the moment another asset surpasses it in market capitalization rankings, particularly on CoinMarketCap.

According to the tweet, Hoskinson suggested that Bitcoin’s value is largely tied to its size and widespread adoption rather than its technical capabilities. Xaif Crypto emphasized a key claim, saying that if another asset overtakes Bitcoin, its dominance could collapse.

The analyst connected this argument to XRP’s past market performance, noting that XRP overtook Ethereum in 2018 and alleging that this shift triggered immediate resistance toward Ripple. The post claims that such actions were not driven by regulatory concerns but by competition and survival within the market.

BREAKING: @IOHK_Charles just revealed something big

"the minute some other asset flips bitcoin on coinmarketcap bitcoin dies.$XRP flipped ethereum in 2018. the attacks on @ripple started immediately. they knew bitcoin was next. the suppression was never about rules it was… https://t.co/O48AI5HL0N pic.twitter.com/gjkrUH2CRc

— Xaif Crypto (@Xaif_Crypto) April 6, 2026

Core Argument on Bitcoin’s Value and Limitations

In the attached video, Hoskinson explains that Bitcoin maintains its value because of user perception and its large network of holders. He argues that the asset’s strength lies in collective belief rather than utility. He states that once a competing asset emerges with similar monetary properties but greater functionality, users may begin to shift away from Bitcoin.

Hoskinson adds that Bitcoin benefits from regulatory clarity, institutional participation, and acceptance by governments and central banks. However, he also points out structural limitations, particularly its inability to evolve quickly. He contrasts this with networks that have active leadership and adaptable development cultures.

He further claims that Bitcoin lacks a central figure to guide innovation, unlike Ethereum, which he notes has visible leadership. According to him, Bitcoin’s culture resists change, making it difficult to implement new features or respond to competition.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Comparison to Market Shifts and Institutional Behavior

Hoskinson draws a comparison between Bitcoin and past technology monopolies, stating that dominant players can lose their position if they fail to adapt. He references how companies with strong market control historically declined when innovation slowed.

He also discusses the growing role of decentralized finance and structured financial products. Hoskinson explains that Bitcoin can generate additional value when used on other networks that offer yield opportunities. He suggests that institutional players, such as BlackRock, are more focused on returns than ideological alignment, which could drive demand for Bitcoin-based financial products outside its native network.

Xaif Crypto’s post concludes by reinforcing the idea that XRP’s earlier rise in market rankings signaled a potential shift in the competitive landscape. The analyst presents this as evidence that market dynamics extend beyond technology and include strategic positioning among leading digital assets.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Just Revealed Something Big That Exposes Attacks On XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Hoskinson clarified, “I did support you when you got sued by the Security Exchange Commission. There’s videos of me. You could pull them up from years ago, where I said it was the wrong decision.”

While he had issues with the XRP army at the time, he still realized that the SEC’s actions were wrong. Despite this, some in the XRP community questioned why he did not provide financial aid.

An XRP Community Lecture. I wonder why he didn't mention the Ethereum ICO? pic.twitter.com/FeBXW3AerS

— Digital Asset Investor (@digitalassetbuy) March 28, 2026

Ripple’s Financial Independence

Hoskinson emphasized that Ripple had significant resources to manage the SEC case independently. “The Ripple organization gave itself a mammoth pre-mine. That’s a fact. It’s like tens of billions of dollars now that they have access to. They didn’t need any money,” he said.

He compared Ripple to other projects such as EOS, which allocated $4 billion to itself in 2017. Hoskinson highlighted that Cardano, by contrast, did not allocate 70% of its supply to founders.

Funding and Revenue

Hoskinson questioned the origins of Ripple’s funding for major initiatives. He asked where Ripple secured the funding to acquire Hidden Road for $1.25 billion. He also drew attention to the revenue from RLUSD, the stablecoin the company launched in late 2024.

He pointed out that standard subscription models alone could not generate the scale of these projects. His remarks show that Ripple kept XRP to fund its operations rather than giving the tokens out to the public.

Hoskinson’s Selective Focus

Digital Asset Investor noted that while Hoskinson critiqued the XRP community, he did not address Ethereum’s ICO and its funding model. He is publicly criticizing Ripple’s actions, but just like the SEC did, he has not called out Ethereum, which did a similar thing through its ICO.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

This omission is crucial because Ethereum also had substantial pre-mined allocations. This raised questions about the balance of Hoskinson’s critique, even as he acknowledged past engagement with Ripple executives and expressed willingness to collaborate with the company.

The Challenge in Crypto Discourse

Hoskinson addressed challenges in crypto discussions, noting that many people struggle to separate arguments from personalities. He criticized the effects of social media, cable news, and poor information habits, emphasizing that these factors make nuanced conversation and critical thinking difficult in the industry.

However, as Digital Asset Investor highlighted, Hoskinson criticized the XRP community while failing to mention Ethereum’s ICO. This selective focus raises questions about consistency in his critique.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Gives XRP Community Lecture That Got XRP Army Talking appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Hoskinson’s remarks drew attention because they contrast with bullish perspectives from many prominent industry figures. His comments focus on the legislation’s impact on the crypto industry, particularly how it treats new projects versus established networks.

Hoskinson explained that the bill treats most digital assets as securities by default. He added that XRP and Cardano could be exceptions, likely “grandfathered in” under the legislation. The court has already ruled that XRP is not a security, and Hoskinson’s comments suggest that both networks may avoid the stricter regulatory requirements applied to new tokens entering the market.

IS THIS TRUE??

Co-founder of Cardano – Charles Hoskinson says that #XRP and #ADA will benefit from the CLARITY ACT, but the rest will be securities by default! pic.twitter.com/sCl9x2TMiJ

— JackTheRippler © (@RippleXrpie) March 7, 2026

Challenges for the Broader Crypto Industry

Despite these exceptions, Hoskinson emphasized that the bill presents serious challenges for the broader crypto ecosystem. He mentioned that many decentralized finance protocols and stablecoin projects receive no specific protections. He noted, “There’s nothing in this for DeFi. Nothing. Uniswap doesn’t get anything. Prediction markets don’t get anything. Armstrong can’t even get his yield-bearing stablecoins.”

This refers to Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrawing support for the CLARITY Act. Armstrong pulled support because the bill’s stablecoin-related language would limit certain yield‑bearing stablecoin mechanisms, which Coinbase views as essential for how platforms compete and offer services.

Hoskinson also criticized the bill’s overall approach, saying, “This is not a good bill.” He said the legislation could create regulatory hurdles for future projects, even as it provides clarity for networks like XRP and Cardano.

Some experts believe the CLARITY Act will benefit XRP, and Hoskinson acknowledged that some aspects could help legacy networks. However, his remarks highlight potential risks for innovation and adoption in other sectors of the crypto industry.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

What the CLARITY Act Seeks to Do

The CLARITY Act designs clearer rules for digital assets in the U.S. It clarifies when a cryptocurrency qualifies as a security or a commodity and assigns regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC. The bill passed the House of Representatives in 2025 and is currently under review in the Senate. Its goal is to create a legal framework that provides clarity for institutional investors, banks, and blockchain projects.

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, has expressed confidence in the legislation’s passage. He estimates a 90% chance that the CLARITY Act will be enacted by April 2026. However, with major industry stakeholders standing against it, it could face hurdles.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Says XRP and ADA Will Benefit from CLARITY Act, But… appeared first on Times Tabloid.

In a brief but pointed post, Cobb quoted Hoskinson as saying, “It looks like XRP might get a free pass,” attaching a video clip in which the Cardano founder criticized a proposed regulatory framework.

Although Hoskinson did not explicitly name the legislation in the clip, his reference to making “everything a security by default” aligns with criticism directed at the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act.

The bill, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives as H.R. 3633, seeks to establish a clearer regulatory structure for digital assets by defining the roles of federal agencies and setting standards for token classification.

Supporters argue that it provides long-awaited clarity, while critics contend that aspects of the bill could expand the authority of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“It looks like XRP might get a free pass”

pic.twitter.com/hPAuqfwPNZ

— Cobb (@Cobb_XRPL) March 3, 2026

Hoskinson’s Critique of the Bill

In the attached video, Hoskinson stated that XRP, along with Cardano, might be “grandfathered in” under the process he described. However, he strongly opposed the bill’s implications.

He argued that passing what he called a “horrific trash bill” would classify digital assets as securities by default and create regulatory attack vectors through bureaucratic mechanisms that could hinder future American cryptocurrency projects.

Hoskinson further asserted that the legislation excludes meaningful provisions for decentralized finance. He said decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap would receive no benefit, nor would prediction markets.

He also referenced Brian Armstrong, suggesting that even yield-bearing stablecoin products would not gain clarity under the proposal. In his assessment, the bill fails to accommodate significant segments of the digital asset industry.

XRP Community Pushback

Cobb’s post brought renewed attention to divisions within the crypto sector, particularly among XRP supporters. Several commenters rejected the implication that XRP’s regulatory position could be described as a free pass.

Users pointed to the multi-year legal battle involving Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which began in 2020 and resulted in prolonged litigation and substantial financial penalties. One commenter referenced the reported $125 million penalty and four years of court proceedings as evidence that XRP’s regulatory standing was achieved through sustained legal resistance rather than preferential treatment.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Other responses criticized what they viewed as a shifting narrative from parts of the broader industry. Some argued that during the period of regulatory uncertainty surrounding XRP, support from other projects was limited, making the “free pass” characterization particularly contentious.

Legislative Context and Regulatory Debate

By highlighting Hoskinson’s remarks, Cobb has underscored ongoing disagreements over how digital assets should be regulated in the United States. While the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act is intended to create a structured legal framework, debate continues over whether its approach would promote innovation or impose restrictive classifications.

Hoskinson’s comments reflect concern about a system in which most digital assets would fall under securities regulation unless explicitly exempted. At the same time, members of the XRP community emphasize the cost and duration of past enforcement actions, arguing that regulatory clarity for any asset should not be framed as an unearned advantage.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Says XRP Might Get a Free Pass. Here’s why appeared first on Times Tabloid.

In the post, Leader Alpha wrote that Hoskinson had a “secret dinner” with Liu, where they discussed their respective ecosystems and identified what he described as common ground.

The tweet says the two blockchain figures moved beyond long-standing rivalry narratives between the Cardano and Solana communities.

Leader Alpha further claimed that tokens associated with Midnight, identified in the tweet as $NIGHT, were airdropped directly to Solana wallets. He added that major cross-chain collaborations involving Solana-based applications could be forthcoming.

Framing the development as a turning point, Leader Alpha asked whether what he called the “ADA vs SOL war” might effectively be over. He concluded by stating that the situation “changes everything,” while tagging Cardano (ADA), Solana (SOL), and NIGHT.

MIND-BLOWING JUST IN

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson just spilled the tea:

He had a SECRET dinner with Solana Foundation President Lily Liu…

They found COMMON GROUND…

AIRDROPPED $NIGHT straight to Solana wallets…

And now? MASSIVE cross-chain collabs… pic.twitter.com/mTesaY7LVC

— Leader Alpha (@LeaderAlphaNews) February 15, 2026

Hoskinson’s Remarks in the Attached Video

In a video attached to the tweet, Hoskinson confirmed that he recently had dinner with Lily Liu. He stated, “I had dinner with Lily Liu the other day. We got to talk about Solana and actually find common ground.” He described Liu as highly confident in Solana’s position, recounting that at the table she expressed the view that Solana had already won the competitive battle among blockchains.

Hoskinson acknowledged that in previous exchanges, he had taken a more combative tone, asserting that Cardano was the leading platform. However, he explained that the recent discussion adopted a different approach. He noted that Midnight tokens had been airdropped to Solana wallets and added that there are multiple Solana applications with which collaboration may be possible.

His comments suggest a shift from rivalry toward potential interoperability, at least at the exploratory level. While he did not outline specific technical integrations or timelines, the remarks indicate that conversations between representatives of the two ecosystems have taken place.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Implications for Cardano and Solana Communities

The interaction carries symbolic significance given the competitive history between Cardano and Solana supporters. The suggestion of cross-chain engagement, particularly through Midnight-related initiatives, introduces the possibility of shared development efforts rather than continued ecosystem isolation.

Leader Alpha’s post emphasizes the idea that collaboration could replace rivalry narratives. However, the tweet does not provide detailed documentation of formal agreements, technical roadmaps, or structured partnership announcements. Instead, it focuses on Hoskinson’s recounting of the dinner and the acknowledgment of potential cooperation.

At this stage, neither Hoskinson nor Liu has publicly released a detailed implementation plan outlining how or when collaborative efforts would materialize.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator’s Secret Dinner with Solana Foundation President Lily Liu appeared first on Times Tabloid.

He explained that when his thoughts drifted toward wealth or possessions, he experienced setbacks. This statement highlights his belief that personal financial gain should not drive decisions in cryptocurrency development. Hoskinson’s remarks suggest that his focus is on principles and long-term goals rather than immediate profits.

"If you’re in it to get rich, you’ve already lost."

Charles Hoskinson is selling all his stuff and going "back to punk rock, yo."

Is this going to be a turning point for Cardano? #ada pic.twitter.com/sIMOK2WHsF

— Jungle Inc Crypto News (@jungleincxrp) February 1, 2026

Implications for Cardano (ADA)

Hoskinson’s perspective may influence the approach to Cardano’s ongoing development. The network has steadily grown in areas such as smart contracts, decentralized finance, and blockchain infrastructure.

By emphasizing purpose over profit, Hoskinson signals a commitment to foundational objectives, including reliability, scalability, and practical application in the real world.

Jungle Inc highlighted Hoskinson’s comments to reinforce this point. The post frames the founder’s statement as a guiding principle. He suggests that Cardano’s progress is rooted in meaningful development rather than short-term financial incentives. By distancing himself from the pursuit of wealth, he aims to ensure decisions prioritize the network’s integrity and long-term success.

Working to Advance the Crypto Space

Cardano is actively working with Ripple, reflecting a shared focus on practical blockchain utility. Ripple executives have consistently emphasized prioritizing adoption and real-world applications over short-term price movements. This alignment of values makes the two networks compatible for collaboration.

Cardano’s efforts to expand its platform, including wallet support and ecosystem development, complement Ripple’s approach to promoting efficient cross-border transactions and token usability. By working together, both projects aim to strengthen their networks, increase adoption, and enhance the overall utility of XRP and Cardano within the broader blockchain landscape.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Setting an Example

Hoskinson’s focus on principles over profit sets a visible example for the broader cryptocurrency community. By publicly articulating this stance, he clarifies his approach to leadership and development. Success in blockchain projects is not defined solely by financial gain but by meaningful contributions to technology and infrastructure.

While price growth is still important for ADA, his focus on purpose over personal gain offers a clear view of how he approaches Cardano’s development. Hoskinson’s philosophy reflects a commitment to building technology with long-term value. By prioritizing foundational goals over wealth, he reinforces that meaningful progress in blockchain is rooted in dedication, innovation, and clarity of purpose.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator: If You’re In It to Get Rich, You’ve Already Lost appeared first on Times Tabloid.

The remarks were delivered in a video captioned in the post and focused on clarifying Hoskinson’s position toward the XRP community, explaining why reactions to certain comments have at times been heightened.

The exchange reflects ongoing sensitivities within the digital asset space, particularly where regulatory history and prominent industry figures intersect.

Charles Hoskinson responds to criticism from the XRP community:

There’s no issue with the XRPL community. They’re great people. The sensitivity comes from the SEC lawsuit and past history. Any criticism of Brad gets made bigger than it really is. pic.twitter.com/7LfPUDkcJO

— Xaif Crypto| (@Xaif_Crypto) January 22, 2026

Hoskinson’s View on the XRPL Community

In the video referenced by Xaif Crypto, Hoskinson emphasized that he does not hold negative views toward the XRPL community.

He described members of that community as constructive participants in the broader digital asset sector and rejected the idea of an underlying conflict between Cardano and XRPL supporters. According to Hoskinson, the perception of hostility often arises not from substantive disagreement, but from how criticism is interpreted and amplified.

He explained that reactions are frequently shaped by the long-running regulatory pressures faced by XRP, particularly the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit and earlier industry disputes.

In Hoskinson’s view, this history has contributed to an atmosphere where comments, especially those involving figures such as Brad Garlinghouse, are sometimes received with greater intensity than intended. He suggested that criticism in a general or policy-focused context can be interpreted as personal or adversarial due to these lingering tensions.

Regulatory History and the Clarity Act

Hoskinson also referenced legislative efforts, including the Clarity Act, to illustrate how complex policy discussions can become mischaracterized. He noted that the act began with what he considered a solid initial structure, but later underwent extensive changes through numerous amendments.

This point was raised to underscore how nuanced regulatory conversations can be reduced to simplified narratives, which then feed into broader misunderstandings between communities.

By highlighting this example, Hoskinson appeared to argue that disagreements over regulation or governance should not be viewed as attacks on specific projects or communities. Instead, he framed them as part of a necessary, and often messy, process of developing clearer rules for the digital asset industry.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

XRP Community Reaction and Broader Implications

The tweet also included commentary from an X user known as Pastor Blackwood, who expressed respect for Hoskinson’s stance.

While identifying as an XRP holder, the commenter argued that some community members can become overly influenced by the opinions and behavior of prominent figures, rather than forming independent judgments.

He further stated his belief that Hoskinson and Brian Armstrong are advocating for the interests of everyday participants in the space, rather than acting against specific projects.

Overall, the exchange reflects a continuing effort by industry leaders to address misunderstandings between different digital asset communities.

Hoskinson’s remarks, as presented by Xaif Crypto, focused on reducing perceived friction and encouraging a more measured interpretation of criticism, particularly in a sector still shaped by unresolved regulatory history.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Responds to Criticism from the XRP Community appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Despite the tension, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has taken a cooperative approach. He emphasizes securing regulatory clarity even if the bill is not perfect.

Garlinghouse argues that establishing workable rules now provides a foundation for further improvements. His stance prioritizes engagement with lawmakers over outright opposition.

Charles Hoskinson Calls Out Ripple CEO

In contrast, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has voiced strong criticism of those willing to accept the bill in its current form.

In a recent video shared by XRP Ledger validator Vet (@Vet_X0), Hoskinson said this collaborative approach would “Hand it to the same people who sued us. Handed to the same people who put us out of business, who subpoenaed us, who put us in jail.”

Hoskinson claimed that the bill was written by Elizabeth Warren. While this is unverified, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong shares Hoskinson’s sentiment. When withdrawing support, Armstrong described the bill as “materially worse than the status quo.”

How about focusing on helping shape the Clarity Bill instead of crashing out on Brad for no reason, Charles? pic.twitter.com/3jDHUiEbNp

— Vet (@Vet_X0) January 18, 2026

A Call for Collaboration

Hoskinson further criticized Garlinghouse’s approach, asking, “That’s better? That’s what we fought for?” As the CEO of the company that was involved in the longest legal battle with the SEC, many would assume Garlinghouse would take a more critical stance toward the bill. However, Garlinghouse has always taken a more inclusive approach to cryptocurrency adoption and regulation.

Hoskinson’s comments were criticized by many in the XRP army, with some commenters calling him out for complaining without providing a solution. Vet also urged Hoskinson to focus on shaping the Clarity Act rather than criticizing Garlinghouse.

Engagement with the legislative process allows the crypto industry to influence provisions and create a workable framework. This approach aligns with Garlinghouse’s stance, advocating active participation over withdrawal.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Securing Clarity Through Engagement

Industry consensus appears critical at this stage. Former Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that the White House may withdraw support for the bill if Coinbase does not come back to the table. Garlinghouse’s position highlights a pragmatic strategy. By accepting partial clarity now, the sector can secure foundational regulatory clarity.

The crypto industry already took a major step forward with the Genius Act in 2025. Engaging now could prevent prolonged uncertainty and support continued innovation. Input from major players, including Coinbase, Ripple, and other stakeholders, can determine whether the legislation advances or faces delays.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Cardano Creator Lashes Out At Ripple CEO, XRP Army Reacts appeared first on Times Tabloid.