Ripple’s intellectual property and the long-running discussion about the future of cross-border payments returned to focus after crypto researcher SMQKE publicized documents on X that he believes reinforce Ripple’s position in the financial technology sector.
SMQKE’s post centered on the claim that Ripple’s patented technology prevents competitors from replicating the XRP Ledger’s efficiency, leading to the conclusion that any institution seeking similar capabilities would need to integrate with Ripple’s technology rather than creating an identical alternative.
SMQKE summarized his position with a direct message, stating that Ripple’s technology is patented and that SWIFT cannot copy the XRP Ledger. He added that Ripple’s patents prevent competitors from using similar blockchain networks without permission. Based on that view, he concluded that SWIFT’s only practical option for using the XRPL would be through integration with Ripple’s technology.
‼️ REMEMBER: RIPPLE’S TECHNOLOGY IS PATENTED—> SWIFT CANNOT COPY THE XRPL ‼️
Ripple’s patents prevent competitors from using similar blockchain networks without permission.💯
Therefore, SWIFT will not be able to create a copycat ledger that is as efficient as the XRPL. 🙇♂️… pic.twitter.com/1IfyQgPfxZ
— SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) July 14, 2026
Documents Cited in the Post
To support the claim, SMQKE attached excerpts from what appears to be an academic paper discussing patented blockchain technology in payment systems.
One section uses Ripple’s blockchain payment network as a case study, stating that banks and financial institutions can carry out international transactions more quickly and affordably through RippleNet, describing it as a patented blockchain-based cross-border payment system.
Another highlighted passage states that Ripple’s patented technology grants the company exclusive authority over its payment system and prevents rivals from making unauthorized use of comparable blockchain networks. SMQKE presented these excerpts as documentation supporting his argument that competitors cannot simply duplicate Ripple’s technology while maintaining the same functionality.
The researcher also included another document discussing the future of financial infrastructure. The highlighted section notes that messaging standards such as SWIFT can be integrated into Ripple, while regulatory bodies would set and enforce financial standards. SMQKE used this passage to reinforce his conclusion that integration, rather than replication, represents the likely path for organizations seeking to utilize Ripple’s technology.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Community Responses Offer Different Perspectives
The post also prompted responses that reflected differing interpretations of Ripple’s intellectual property and the role of the XRP Ledger.
One commenter, identified as LORD, rejected the idea that SWIFT would use the XRPL directly. Instead, the commenter stated that banks, rather than SWIFT, will determine which payment infrastructure to adopt. The response also emphasized that future financial infrastructure is expected to be interoperable, allowing multiple payment systems and blockchains to communicate using common standards.
Another commenter, Ledger Legend, agreed that Ripple owns intellectual property related to specific payment technologies but noted that the XRP Ledger itself is open source. According to the commenter, developers and competitors can build blockchain networks with similar capabilities, although Ripple’s patents could restrict the copying of particular payment technologies or proprietary implementations.
SMQKE maintained that the documents support his position, presenting Ripple’s patents and references to SWIFT integration as evidence that the company holds a distinctive technological advantage in the evolving cross-border payments landscape.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
