The SEC’s regulatory posture toward crypto has shifted substantially in 2026. On September 25, the agency’s Division of Corporation Finance published a detailed FAQ page addressing the classification of crypto assets under federal securities law.
Crypto Crusaders creator Levi Rietveld shared the update with his audience, calling it “a big regulatory boost” for XRP. The document builds directly on the landmark March Interpretive Release, which the SEC issued jointly with the CFTC and explicitly classified XRP as a digital commodity.
What the September 25 FAQ Establishes
The FAQ clarifies several key points from the March release. On staking, it confirms that a Staking Receipt Token issued by a protocol-based Liquid Staking Provider qualifies as a digital commodity when it derives its value from “the programmatic operation of a crypto system that is functional, as well as supply and demand dynamics.”
The document also confirms that once a crypto system is functional, activities to maintain, secure, or improve it do not constitute essential managerial efforts under the Howey test. That matters for XRP because it removes a key argument the SEC previously used to pursue securities enforcement.
$XRP JUST GOT A BIG REGULATORY BOOST pic.twitter.com/3sLOHArZlm
— Levi | Crypto Crusaders (@LeviCryptoGuy) September 27, 2026
XRP’s Position in the Framework
The March Interpretive Release named XRP directly as a digital commodity. The March 2026 release says that, based on the characteristics, terms, and XRP’s functions as of the release date, the Commission concludes XRP is a digital commodity. This matches the court ruling that XRP in itself is not a security.
The September FAQ reinforces that classification by building out the legal architecture around it. Rietveld noted that “the SEC’s own framework lists XRP as a digital commodity,” and the FAQ confirms that framework carries formal agency authority, even though it stops short of statutory law.
What This Means for Institutional Access
Rietveld argued that institutions waiting for regulatory clarity before getting more involved with XRP now have reason to act. The September FAQ strengthens that case. It narrows liability for platforms listing XRP, reducing friction for institutional participation.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
The CLARITY Act failed its Senate cloture vote 49-50, with no Democratic support. The SEC FAQ acknowledges its own limits: “These FAQs have no legal force or effect, do not alter or amend applicable law, and do not create any new or additional obligations for any person.”
The agency is building a regulatory structure through guidance rather than statute. That structure now includes the March Interpretive Release, the innovation exemption under Project Crypto, and the September 25 FAQ. Together, they represent the most defined regulatory environment XRP has operated in.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
