The prolonged legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reached a critical juncture. Both parties had earlier approached the court to finalize a proposed $50 million settlement and put a definite end to the long legal battle.
However, the initial settlement agreement, aimed at resolving the SEC’s allegations against Ripple for unregistered securities sales, was dismissed by Judge Torres due to procedural issues.
This dismissal necessitates a resubmission that adheres to the court’s procedural requirements. Despite expectations for a prompt refile, the absence of such action has led to speculation about the reasons behind the delay.
Fred Rispoli’s Perspective on the Delay
Legal expert Fred Rispoli has provided insights into the situation, suggesting that the delay might be strategic. He notes that the SEC and Ripple have until June 16, 2025, to file a joint status update with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
20 days later, no refile yet by SEC and Ripple in district court and the June 16 deadline for the status update in the 2nd Circuit looms large. Expect the refile before Judge Torres to happen by then. If there is nothing pending before Torres when the parties file the…1/3 https://t.co/XSq3uYC0Bj
— Fred Rispoli (@freddyriz) June 4, 2025
According to Rispoli, if no motion is pending before Judge Torres by that date, the appellate court will proceed based solely on the existing record, potentially restarting the briefing process. Conversely, if a motion is pending, the Second Circuit is likely to grant an additional 60 days for the district court to address the matter.
Rispoli interprets Judge Torres’ dismissal as a signal that both parties need to approach the court with a more conciliatory tone. He questions whether the SEC is willing to exhibit the necessary humility to move forward, stating, “Ripple will say whatever to get it done, but how much public groveling is the SEC willing to do? And how much groveling will be authorized?”
We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023
Implications for Ripple’s Future
The outcome of this legal process holds significant implications for Ripple’s future operations. The company seeks to negotiate terms that would vacate certain unfavorable aspects of Judge Torres’ ruling, such as the $125 million penalty and the permanent injunction on XRP sales to institutional investors. These elements could pose obstacles to Ripple’s future fundraising and public offering endeavors if not resolved.
The Road Ahead
As the June 16 deadline approaches, the legal community and XRP stakeholders await the next move from both Ripple and the SEC. The refiled settlement agreement, if submitted, could pave the way for a resolution to this long-standing legal dispute. Until then, the case remains in a state of uncertainty, with the potential to influence the broader regulatory landscape for digital assets in the United States.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
