Jake Claver, a recognized business leader and financial strategist, recently addressed a common misconception about XRP and its market cap.
His perspective challenges the conventional approach of applying traditional market capitalization models to a digital asset designed for global financial settlement. He argued that the comparison between XRP and a publicly traded company is fundamentally flawed.
Claver states that valuing XRP like a company is akin to comparing “a car factory to every highway in the world.” The analogy underscores the distinction between a business that produces goods and a financial network designed to facilitate the movement of value across the global economy.
While companies generate revenue through sales and profits, XRP functions as a liquidity solution for international transactions, where its utility increases as more institutions adopt it.
Most people get this completely wrong – Let's talk about market cap myths and #XRP
1/8— Jake Claver, QFOP (@beyond_broke) February 24, 2025
The Misconception of Market Capitalization
A common mistake in the cryptocurrency space is using market capitalization as the primary measure of an asset’s potential. Claver challenges this notion, suggesting that traditional market cap calculations are not an effective way to determine XRP’s value. He references how past assumptions once deemed trillion-dollar valuations impossible for companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Saudi Aramco—yet these companies have exceeded those expectations.
Applying stock market valuation principles to XRP disregards its role in the financial system. Unlike a stock, which represents ownership in a company, XRP is a bridge asset designed to facilitate high-value transactions between banks, payment providers, and other financial institutions.
As Claver emphasizes, “XRP isn’t playing little league—it’s built to handle TRILLIONS in daily global transactions.” This level of utility requires a higher valuation for the asset to function effectively.
We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023
Why a Higher XRP Price is Essential
A key argument in Claver’s statement is that a higher XRP price is not just a possibility but a necessity. He explains that as financial institutions integrate XRP for large-scale transactions, the asset’s value must increase to accommodate liquidity needs.
“More value = more capacity to handle huge transactions. It’s like adding lanes to that highway,” he states, reinforcing that a higher price allows for more efficient global financial movement.
Other market observers share this perspective. One user, DJ Corkey, noted, “If the original intent of XRP is to be realized, it MUST be priced higher. Comparing it to any other coin or asset is foolish. It’s not like anything else.”
Another user, Calewis, highlighted the irrelevance of traditional market cap metrics in determining XRP’s ceiling price, stating that market capitalization is merely a gauge of where capital is currently allocated, not a limit on an asset’s potential.
A Shift in Perspective is Needed
The debate over XRP’s valuation stems from a broader misunderstanding of its role in the financial system. Many analysts attempt to assess its potential using stock market principles, but as Claver asserts, “Most ‘experts’ miss this completely.” XRP is not a traditional investment vehicle—it is a utility-driven asset designed to facilitate seamless value transfer on a global scale.
As more financial institutions adopt XRP, its necessity and demand will likely grow. If it is to fulfill its intended purpose—acting as a high-volume liquidity bridge for trillions in daily transactions—its price must reflect that level of utility. Those who continue to apply outdated valuation models risk missing the bigger picture of XRP’s function in the evolving financial landscape.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
