The Clarity Act failed to advance in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday after lawmakers could not secure the 60 votes required to move the legislation forward. The procedural vote ended 49-50, leaving the digital asset market structure bill stalled after months of negotiations between Republicans and Democrats.
The result immediately raised questions about whether the legislation has reached the end of its path in the current Congress. Former Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett updated followers on X after speaking with two Republican senators, John Kennedy of Louisiana and Ted Cruz of Texas, who offered different explanations for the setback while leaving open the possibility of another attempt.
According to Terrett’s tweet, Kennedy said he “wasn’t surprised” that the Clarity Act vote failed. However, he does not believe the bill is necessarily dead.
🚨NEW: @SenJohnKennedy (R-LA) just told me he “wasn’t surprised” the Clarity Act vote failed but does not believe the bill is necessarily dead.
“I think my Democratic colleagues understand that we need to design a market structure for cryptocurrency that looks like somebody…
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) September 15, 2026
Kennedy Points to a Potential Lame-Duck Return
Terrett reported that Kennedy believes Democrats understand the need for a cryptocurrency market structure that is deliberately designed and clearly defined. He said the legislation may have to wait until the lame-duck session.
“I think my Democratic colleagues understand that we need to design a market structure for cryptocurrency that looks like somebody designed it on purpose,” Kennedy told Terrett. “But it’s gonna have to wait until the lame duck session.”
The senator’s comments indicate that he sees the failed vote as a delay rather than an absolute end to the legislation. However, any attempt to revive the measure during the lame-duck period would still face significant procedural and legislative requirements.
One commenter, Malhar Oza, noted that a lame-duck effort would still require action from the House. He said the House would need to pass the Senate’s text word for word, while legislation not enacted before January 3 would expire with the current Congress.
Cruz Blames Democrats for the Setback
Cruz offered a more direct assessment of Tuesday’s outcome. Terrett reported that the Texas senator referenced The Princess Bride while describing the bill’s status.
“There’s a big difference between dead and mostly dead. I hope it comes back to life,” Cruz said.
He also blamed Democrats for the failure, accusing them of “playing politics” and pushing cryptocurrency activity and jobs overseas.
The comments came as Democrats continued to raise objections to provisions in the legislation, particularly issues involving ethics and digital asset activity by government officials. Republican supporters released revisions before the vote to address some of those concerns, but the changes did not produce the 60 votes needed to proceed.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Questions Remain Over What Comes Next
The failed vote was procedural, not a final vote on whether the Clarity Act should become law. The Senate did not begin full consideration of the legislation after the motion to proceed failed.
While commenter Jared Langel raised the possibility of future regulatory action involving the SEC and CFTC, another X user questioned why the United States still lacks comprehensive federal cryptocurrency legislation despite its large digital asset market.
For now, Kennedy’s comments leave open the possibility of a renewed legislative effort during the lame-duck session, while Cruz expressed hope that lawmakers could bring the bill back. The immediate result, however, is that the Clarity Act remains stalled after Tuesday’s Senate vote.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
