Crypto enthusiast Skipper recently shared a video addressing a central argument surrounding XRP’s long-term valuation.
The video emphasized that XRP’s price cannot remain low if it fulfills its intended purpose as a global bridge currency. The explanation centered on XRP’s limited supply, fixed issuance, and intended use in high-volume cross-border transactions.
The video highlighted that XRP has a maximum supply of 100 billion tokens, most of which are already in circulation. Unlike fiat currencies, XRP cannot be printed or created at will, making its supply finite.
The speaker underscored that this scarcity is a fundamental distinction between XRP and traditional government-issued currencies. As a result, its valuation would need to reflect the scale of liquidity and settlement efficiency expected from a global settlement asset.
This video explains why the #XRP price cannot be cheap. pic.twitter.com/1Rk0407Nki
— Skipper | XRPL (@skipper_xrp) November 10, 2025
The Case for Higher Valuation in Utility-Based Models
According to the video, if XRP operates as the underlying bridge asset connecting banking systems and global financial institutions, it must support massive volumes. The reasoning presented was that such a role would necessitate a significantly higher price point, with figures mentioned ranging from $100 to $1,000.
The argument followed a utility-based valuation model rather than a speculative one. In this view, the value of XRP would need to rise proportionally to the scale of the liquidity it provides.
The speaker claimed that a higher price ensures sufficient liquidity for cross-border settlements without requiring excessive token movement. By extension, if major financial institutions adopt XRP for daily global transactions, its market value would need to accommodate the enormous sums transferred through the network.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Community Perspective on XRP’s Circulating Supply
Following Skipper’s post, other users contributed to the discussion. One user, identified as Charles Vine, pointed out that while no new XRP can be created, more tokens can still be released into circulation from escrow accounts. His observation addressed the fact that Ripple periodically releases portions of its escrowed XRP to maintain liquidity and support institutional use.
This comment drew attention to an important nuance in XRP’s tokenomics: while total supply remains fixed, the amount available for trading can still fluctuate based on escrow releases. Nonetheless, proponents of Skipper’s view argue that this does not diminish XRP’s potential to appreciate over time, as the overall cap prevents dilution comparable to fiat inflation.
Skipper’s video reignited interest in XRP’s long-term value potential based on its designed role in global finance. The argument rested on fixed supply, high utility demand, and liquidity requirements that would make a low valuation unsustainable if XRP were widely adopted by banks and institutions.
While opinions differ on specific price targets, the discussion underscores a growing focus on the relationship between XRP’s practical function and its intrinsic market value.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
