In a recent post on X, SMQKE wrote, “Ripple and Stellar have already undergone testing by SWIFT. XRP + XLM SWIFT. Now, it’s time for their live integrations.”

The statement presents a direct argument that previous testing should lead to real-world implementation. SMQKE describes the development as a progression rather than a possibility, indicating that institutional experimentation has already established a foundation for potential deployment.

The post also referenced a message shared in February, in which SMQKE asserted that a SWIFT webinar confirmed Ripple and Stellar were among the blockchain platforms examined during initial experimentation phases.

Ripple and Stellar have already undergone testing by SWIFT.

XRP + XLM SWIFT

Now, it’s time for their live integrations. https://t.co/5B5pjYzySJ

— SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) March 23, 2026

SWIFT Webinar Confirms Scope of Blockchain Trials

To support the claim, SMQKE included a video excerpt from a SWIFT-hosted webinar. In the clip, a speaker explained that between 45 and 50 commercial banks participated in early blockchain research efforts around 2015. The speaker stated that the initiative explored the potential role of blockchain technology within financial systems.

According to the webinar, those early evaluations included networks such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Stellar, and Ripple, along with other available blockchain solutions at the time. The speaker added that these efforts were part of early projects, including one referred to as Project Genesis, and described the period as one of strong institutional interest in distributed ledger technology.

This information aligns with SMQKE’s position that Ripple and Stellar were actively assessed within a structured environment involving multiple financial institutions coordinated by SWIFT.

Community Response Raises Regulatory Considerations

The post also prompted a detailed response from X user Neil Moonstrong, who questioned whether past experimentation should be interpreted as a signal for present-day adoption. In his reply on X, Moonstrong argued that the testing cited by SMQKE took place during a period when regulatory frameworks were less developed.

He stated that blockchain systems are now evaluated based on factors such as validator control, consensus structure, and the concentration of risk. According to Moonstrong, these considerations have become more significant as regulatory oversight has increased.

Moonstrong raised specific concerns regarding Stellar’s consensus model, explaining that quorum slices may appear decentralized but can concentrate trust within a limited set of validators. He argued that this structure could create exposure to regulatory pressure, describing it as a form of regulatory capture risk.

He concluded by stating that “testing ≠ adoption,” emphasizing that the regulatory environment has changed significantly since the initial experimentation phase.

Debate Reflects Diverging Interpretations of Blockchain Readiness

The exchange between SMQKE and Moonstrong presents two contrasting interpretations of the same historical developments. SMQKE views early SWIFT testing as a completed validation phase that supports immediate progression toward integration. In contrast, Moonstrong considers those experiments as preliminary steps that do not reflect current regulatory and institutional requirements.

The discussion on X continues to focus on whether early institutional trials can be used as a reliable basis for modern adoption decisions, particularly in a financial system that now places greater emphasis on regulatory clarity and risk management.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

The post Researcher: SWIFT Has Already Tested Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) appeared first on Times Tabloid.

While decentralized finance offers many opportunities, it also introduces multiple layers of counterparty risk. Crypto enthusiasts who focus on holding their assets directly argue that simplicity may provide better results over time.

Avoid Lending and Loans

Stellar Expert (@StellarExpert), a crypto enthusiast focused on XRP and XLM, warned investors about exposing their tokens through lending or borrowing. He posted, “Do NOT lend your XLM. Do NOT take a loan against your XLM. Do NOT let it be rehypothecated.” Each layer of yield carries additional risk. When tokens leave an investor’s control, the risk shifts to the counterparties.

This perspective mirrors strategies used by holders of XRP, which has limited exposure to DeFi products. Investors who held XRP directly have benefited from price appreciation without engaging in complex financial structures. Stellar Expert suggests a similar approach for XLM. Holding tokens directly keeps them secure and fully under the owner’s control.

Do NOT lend your XLM.

Do NOT take a loan against your XLM.

Do NOT let it be rehypothecated.

Every layer of "yield" is just another counterparty risk. They win when you lose.

Keep it simple. Keep it yours.

— Stellar Expert (@StellarExpert) March 2, 2026

Focus on Direct Ownership

Maintaining direct ownership minimizes unnecessary risk. When tokens are lent or used as collateral, they enter systems controlled by third parties. Every additional participant increases the chance of loss from defaults or operational failures. By keeping XLM in personal wallets, investors eliminate these variables.

Stellar Expert’s guidance stresses the importance of simplicity. Yield-seeking strategies can offer short-term gains but require trust in other parties. Investors are not compensated for this risk if systems fail. Direct ownership avoids these vulnerabilities entirely.

He emphasizes that simplicity protects investors. “Keep it simple. Keep it yours,” he advises. By avoiding these practices, XLM holders retain full control over their assets. Direct ownership can deliver strong results while avoiding the risks associated with complex financial structures.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Strategy for Long-Term Growth

Investors managing XLM should prioritize strategies that preserve full ownership. Avoiding loans and yield products reduces exposure to market participants whose failure could negatively impact holdings.

Stellar Expert’s approach advocates for a disciplined, controlled strategy. By keeping tokens in personal wallets, investors can capture the benefits of network growth without risking counterparty failures.

This method does not prevent participation in the Stellar ecosystem. XLM can still be used for payments, transfers, and on-chain applications. The difference lies in maintaining custody of assets at all times. Holding tokens directly provides security and simplifies portfolio management.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Do Not Lend Or Loan Against Your Stellar (XLM). Here’s Why appeared first on Times Tabloid.

He wrote, “XRP and XLM solve different problems within the same system. One focuses on large-scale liquidity and settlement, the other on access and inclusion. Both are necessary for a functioning global financial network.”

The statement suggested design intent. It also hinted at how blockchain may integrate into existing financial rails rather than replace them overnight.

XRP and XLM solve different problems within the same system. One focuses on large-scale liquidity and settlement, the other on access and inclusion. Both are necessary for a functioning global financial network. pic.twitter.com/U2PX0mvyDp

— Black Swan Capitalist (@VersanAljarrah) December 18, 2025

XRP and the Institutional Core

XRP was designed for speed, liquidity, and scalable settlement. Its design targets financial institutions that move large volumes across borders. Banks, payment providers, and liquidity hubs need assets that settle in seconds, reduce capital lockups, and operate with high reliability. XRP addresses these needs directly.

The XRP Ledger processes transactions in seconds and at low cost. That matters in wholesale finance. Cross-border settlement still relies on slow messaging systems and pre-funded accounts. XRP offers an alternative that reduces friction while fitting into regulated environments.

This institutional focus explains why XRP discussions often center on liquidity corridors, settlement layers, and enterprise adoption. Many also believe it can take over SWIFT’s role and usher in a new era of improved cross-border payment systems.

XLM and Financial Access

Stellar focuses on a different layer of the same system. XLM targets access. Its network supports remittances, micro payments, and financial services for users who remain outside traditional banking. Speed and cost still matter, but inclusion drives the design choices.

The Stellar network works well for consumer-facing applications. It enables tokenized assets, simple wallets, and low-value transfers that make sense in emerging markets. Both assets complement each other and can work together in a two-tier global financial system.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

One System, Two Functions

Aljarrah’s statement places both assets inside one financial architecture. XRP handles high-value settlement between institutions. XLM supports distribution and access at the user level. Together, they reflect how modern finance already operates.

Large banks clear and settle value through centralized systems. Retail users interact through payment apps and local rails. A global blockchain-based network needs both layers. XRP and XLM mirror that structure.

This alignment strengthens their positioning. It reduces overlap. It also increases the chance of coexistence rather than competition.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post XRP and XLM Solve Different Problems Within the Same Financial System appeared first on Times Tabloid.

The message reinforces a long-standing view within institutional finance: the largest volumes and revenues are generated at the bank and corporate level, not through small retail transfers.

According to the analysis, this reality explains the continued relevance of infrastructure-focused firms such as Ripple and Stellar, which are positioned to serve institutional payment flows rather than consumer-facing use cases.

The post challenges the assumption that legacy money transfer companies are on the verge of being replaced. Instead, it suggests that established firms such as Western Union are more likely to adapt by integrating new technologies over time.

The transformation underway is not centered on the immediate removal of intermediaries, but on upgrading the core systems that support large-scale transfers between financial institutions.

Don’t forget: “The BIG MONEY is in cross border payments —> that’s why we have Ripple and Stellar.”

Watch. https://t.co/WMHQKCRh81 pic.twitter.com/SDc3m1RFqj

— SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) December 14, 2025

Business-to-Business Payments as the Core Opportunity

The attached video expands on this idea by explaining that the most expensive and inefficient part of the global payment system exists in cross-border business payments. These transactions occur at scale, involve high volumes, and are typically handled through correspondent banking arrangements.

While the basic structure of these systems remains intact, the speed and efficiency of settlement can be improved through distributed ledger technologies that allow data to move faster than funds traditionally do.

From this perspective, the focus of networks like Ripple and Stellar is not on individual consumers sending money to family members abroad, but on enabling banks to transact with one another more efficiently. The emphasis is on backend infrastructure that supports institutional activity, where even small efficiency gains can translate into substantial cost reductions.

Permissioned Networks and Institutional Design

The speaker in the video also outlines a key distinction between open blockchain systems and those designed for institutional use. Open, permissionless networks enable anyone to participate without approval, which supports accessibility. In contrast, many systems intended for enterprise payments operate on a permissioned basis, where participants are known entities and membership is restricted.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

This structure aligns with regulatory and compliance requirements faced by banks. In such networks, participating institutions maintain direct relationships with one another and transact through shared ledgers that facilitate faster settlement while preserving established governance standards.

The process remains bank-centric, with distributed ledger technology, like the XRPL, acting as an efficiency layer rather than a replacement for the financial system.

Effect on the Payment Landscape

SMQKE’s post ultimately underscores that the largest financial opportunities in digital payments are tied to institutional adoption rather than consumer speculation. By targeting cross-border, high-volume transactions, companies focused on payment infrastructure are addressing a segment of the market where inefficiencies are most costly.

The analysis positions Ripple and Stellar as examples of platforms designed to operate within this reality, emphasizing that the future of payments innovation is being shaped behind the scenes, at the level where banks move money with other banks across borders.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Researcher: This Is Why Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) Are Important appeared first on Times Tabloid.

The slides outline the current state of competition in the cross-border payments sector and the requirements for any system aiming to disrupt the traditional correspondent banking model.

Content of the Slides

The presentation begins by referencing the concept of “disruptive innovation,” attributed to the renowned Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen.

It highlights that technology acts as an enabler, but that a new business model is the key driver of meaningful change. Examples include industries disrupted by companies that do not own the assets traditionally associated with their sector.

The slides then address correspondent banking directly, stating that for any alternative to disrupt the model, it must achieve global reach across all countries and currencies, provide a viable Nostro/Vostro account alternative for settlement, gain regulatory support from authorities familiar with existing systems, justify implementation costs through measurable savings, and deliver superior service to customers.

A separate slide outlines the high level of competition in cross-border payments through a network diagram. This includes both legacy providers and newer entrants.

Ripple and Stellar are displayed alongside other companies and platforms, such as PayPal, TransferWise, Western Union, Ria, MoneyGram, Xoom, CurrencyFair, WorldRemit, Bitcoin, Payoneer, and Align Commerce.

A vertical label on the slide reads “Correspondent Banking disintermediation,” suggesting that these competitors are part of a broader trend toward bypassing or streamlining traditional banking pathways.

Ripple and Stellar featured in SWIFT presentation during discussion of replacing traditional correspondent banking

pic.twitter.com/iZrZYOyuz4

— SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) August 15, 2025

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Ripple and Stellar’s Placement

Ripple and Stellar are positioned within the graphic as players offering faster and more direct alternatives for cross-border settlement.

Their inclusion alongside both major remittance companies and digital payment providers indicates that the presentation views them as part of a competitive field that is already influencing the sector. However, the “not yet” assessment on full disruption shows that SWIFT considers the correspondent banking model still intact, even as competition grows.

Commentary from Denis Samkov

In a response to SMQKE’s post, an X user, Denis Samkov, interpreted the mention of Ripple and Stellar as evidence of an ongoing shift in payment systems. He cautioned that while the inclusion reflects change, entrenched banking practices remain resistant to rapid transformation. He also noted that despite current interest in stablecoins, traditional financial structures will not be replaced in the near term.

The slides shared by SMQKE reveal that SWIFT acknowledges Ripple and Stellar as part of a competitive environment affecting cross-border payments. While the organisation does not yet classify correspondent banking as disrupted, it recognises that alternative networks are creating genuine competitive pressure.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post SWIFT Features Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) As Banking Disruptors appeared first on Times Tabloid.

According to Sammie, Stellar has partnered with Visa, MasterCard, PayPal, and Stripe’s stablecoin division within a single year. The post emphasizes the potential transactional volume such collaborations could bring to the Stellar network, referencing the possible scale of activity that could follow.

Details of Sammie’s Statement

In the post, Sammie said that the partnerships with these four payment industry leaders were all finalized within the same year. Sammie suggested that the cumulative effect of these collaborations could lead to an unprecedented amount of transaction volume being processed on the Stellar network.

While the post did not specify the exact nature of each partnership, the mention of such globally recognized companies highlights the network’s growing integration into mainstream financial infrastructure. Sammie also included the ticker symbol for Stellar’s native asset, XLM, implying a possible correlation between increased network usage and potential interest in the asset.

Stellar partnered with @Visa, @MasterCard, @PayPal, and @Stripe (@Stablecoin) all within a year.
Imagine the insane amount of volume coming to the Stellar Network . $XLM pic.twitter.com/RmS8kotTLM

— sammie (@lukinsisammie) August 8, 2025

XLM Community Reaction and Additional Insights

Another X user, identified as DoubleAgent-XLM, replied to Sammie’s post with a more detailed perspective on the potential impact of these developments. The response noted that transaction velocity, which is the speed at which funds move across the network, would be a critical factor in scaling Stellar’s activity.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

According to DoubleAgent-XLM, multiple use cases such as payroll systems, locked-up payments, and on-chain functionalities like Soroban smart contracts could be major drivers of network usage. They also referenced specific institutional integrations, such as DTCC (Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation) wallets and Salesforce wallets, as possible points of significant adoption.

Potential Implications for the Stellar Network

If the partnerships operate at scale, Stellar could see a sharp increase in the variety and volume of transactions. The involvement of companies like Visa and MasterCard, which process billions of transactions annually, suggests the possibility of Stellar becoming part of existing large-scale payment flows. PayPal’s and Stripe’s active roles in the digital payments and stablecoin sectors could further position Stellar within emerging financial technology ecosystems.

The mention of Soroban, Stellar’s smart contract platform, indicates a potential expansion beyond payments into programmable financial services, adding another layer of network utility.

Sammie’s post highlights a year of significant developments for the Stellar network, with partnerships involving some of the most influential players in global payments.

The additional commentary from DoubleAgent-XLM adds context to how increased transaction velocity, institutional integrations, and broader utility could result in substantial network activity.

While the full scale of these developments remains to be seen, the alignment of multiple high-profile collaborations in a short period signals an important phase in Stellar’s growth trajectory.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Stellar’s Top Four Partnerships With Big Techs that Can Move XLM Massively appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Steph Is Crypto (@Steph_iscrypto), a technical analyst on X, recently shared this observation, highlighting the performance of both assets as they approach key resistance zones after completing similar breakout patterns. This has led many market watchers to assess whether these levels will hold or finally give way.

The most important resistance level for #XRP and #XLM right now! pic.twitter.com/wBlrjhUoA8

— STEPH IS CRYPTO (@Steph_iscrypto) July 31, 2025

Identical Patterns and Shared Resistance

In the analysis presented by Steph, XRP and XLM are seen on the weekly timeframe following near-identical falling wedge patterns. These patterns are typically considered bullish once broken to the upside, and both assets have now done exactly that.

The chart reveals that both assets broke above the upper trendline of the falling wedge in July. After this breakout, each asset’s momentum appears to have stalled near notable resistance levels.

XRP has reached an all-time high of $3.65, and this level has so far held firm, stalling further upward momentum. Similarly, XLM has faced resistance around $0.51, with this ceiling capping its performance in July and preventing it from reaching a new all-time high, including XRP.

Steph Is Crypto described these levels as the most important resistance for both assets, and overcoming them could open the door to significant gains for both assets.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

The Technical Implications of Resistance

The resistance zones on both charts show a clear barrier that has not yet been broken decisively. For XRP, a clean break and close above this zone on the weekly chart would be viewed by many technical analysts as a confirmation of continued bullish momentum.

Other prominent analysts have predicted that breaching the $3.65 level could send XRP toward double-digits. Until such a move occurs, the price could remain trapped below this level, consolidating or even retracing.

XLM faces a similar scenario, where the breakout could potentially send it to a new all-time high, breaking the record it set in 2018. Legendary trader Peter Brandt recently shared bullish predictions for XLM, and if buying pressure increases, the asset could overcome this resistance and meet his expectations.

For both XRP and XLM, this resistance zone is not just a technical level, but represents a psychological barrier, with traders closely watching for signs of strength or weakness.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Here Are XRP and XLM Most Important Resistance Levels Right Now appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez drew attention to this development in a post on X, stating, “Stellar $XLM just lost the 10-day SMA as support: bullish above, bearish below!” His warning underscores a pivotal technical shift that now defines XLM’s short-term market outlook.

Breaking Below the 10-Day SMA

After rallying from below $0.30 to over $0.50 in early July, XLM showed strong momentum. The 10-day SMA consistently provided support throughout the rally, but that support was decisively lost over the weekend. The drop came on increased trading volume, a signal that bearish momentum could be gaining control.

As of report time, Stellar trades between $0.42 and $0.43, down roughly 6% in the past 24 hours and nearly 8% over the past week. The broken 10-day SMA now acts as resistance. As Ali emphasized, the token is in bullish territory only if it reclaims this level. Remaining below it leaves the door open for further downside pressure.

Stellar $XLM just lost the 10-day SMA as support: bullish above, bearish below! pic.twitter.com/f3wkMHZhqd

— Ali (@ali_charts) July 29, 2025

Key Levels and Short-Term Risks

With the 10-day SMA flipped to resistance, the immediate downside target lies at $0.42. If this level fails to hold, the next areas of support are $0.38 and $0.34, zones where XLM previously consolidated during its earlier ascent.

Technical indicators further validate the caution. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped near oversold levels, suggesting weakening momentum. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) has flipped bearish, and long positions are being liquidated rapidly. Open interest has also declined, pointing to reduced conviction from bullish traders.

Despite these bearish indicators, a potential rebound isn’t off the table. A strong move back above the 10-day SMA, ideally with rising volume, could set the stage for a retest of the $0.45 to $0.47 range, and possibly even the recent $0.50 high.

We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023

Long-Term Structure Still Intact

While the short-term setup looks fragile, Stellar’s long-term structure remains bullish. The token is still trading above both its 50-day and 200-day SMAs, currently around $0.32 and $0.31, respectively. These longer-term averages provide deeper support and indicate that the broader trend has not yet reversed.

Analyst Javon Marks has drawn comparisons to XLM’s 2015–2018 cycle, suggesting that a recovery above $0.79 could trigger a much larger breakout, potentially even toward $8.00 in the long run. While this scenario is highly speculative, it shows that long-term bullish sentiment still exists, provided short-term momentum can stabilize.

Ali Martinez’s technical insight captures the essence of XLM’s current dilemma: bullish above the 10-day SMA, bearish below. Stellar now trades at a crossroads, with its short-term fate hinging on whether bulls can reclaim lost support. 

Until then, the pressure remains to the downside, but a recovery could quickly swing momentum in the other direction. As traders await the next decisive move, all eyes remain on the 10-day SMA, a simple line with serious implications.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

The post Stellar (XLM) In Bullish and Bearish Territory after Losing This Support appeared first on Times Tabloid.

In a brief but emphatic post, Stellar Expert stated, “#XLM will skyrocket to $1,000 faster than people anticipate.”

The statement reflects growing sentiment among some market watchers who believe that certain utility-based cryptocurrencies could see rapid appreciation in value as institutional involvement in blockchain infrastructure increases.

The tweet did not elaborate on specific timelines or mechanisms, but the confidence in XLM’s future trajectory was evident. The claim, however, met with some skepticism. One X user, Kenneth Van den Berghe, replied, “No ETF’s up coming. So … Don’t know. Moving slow,” signaling a more cautious outlook.

The comment suggests that not everyone in the community shares the same sense of urgency or optimism, especially in the absence of traditional financial vehicles such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that boost market accessibility and liquidity.

Media Support Emphasizes Institutional Readiness

Supporting Stellar Expert’s bullish stance is a recent Times Tabloid article. The article summarizes comments made by Austin Hilton, a crypto influencer and market analyst, who recently addressed the XLM community in a video posted on his X profile.

In his message, Hilton stressed XLM’s status as an ISO 20022-compliant digital asset, a key feature he believes could lead to significant institutional adoption.

Hilton described XLM not merely as another cryptocurrency but as a structural component of the evolving financial system. According to his view, as banks and financial institutions increasingly explore blockchain solutions that align with regulatory standards, ISO 20022-compliant assets, such as XLM, are likely to gain preferential consideration. He suggested that early holders of such assets may be positioned to benefit as institutional players enter the space more decisively.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

XLM as Part of Broader Regulatory-Focused Asset Class

In addition to discussing XLM directly, Hilton also pointed to other ISO-compliant cryptocurrencies that may be relevant in a similar institutional context.

Another major theme of Hilton’s commentary was the emergence of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), a growing area of blockchain development where compliance, transparency, and operational interoperability are essential.

Hilton argued that ISO-compliant assets are particularly well-positioned to serve this market segment due to their alignment with global messaging standards and potential to interface with existing financial infrastructure.

Market Movement and Sentiment Remain Mixed

While Stellar Expert’s forecast of a $1,000 valuation for XLM may appear bold in the context of the asset’s historical price trends and current market capitalization, the rationale presented by Austin Hilton offers a potential framework for understanding such a projection.

Hilton’s emphasis on XLM’s ISO 20022 compliance, its suitability for institutional integration, and its role in the tokenization of real-world assets presents a forward-looking case that could support significant long-term appreciation.

His view that XLM is not merely a cryptocurrency but a foundational component of future financial infrastructure aligns with the idea that assets meeting regulatory and interoperability standards may be positioned for outsized gains as institutional adoption accelerates.

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Pundit: XLM Will Skyrocket to $1,000 Faster Than People Anticipate appeared first on Times Tabloid.

He underscored the importance of recognizing XLM’s unique position as an ISO 20022-compliant cryptocurrency, highlighting its potential to benefit massively from the coming wave of institutional blockchain adoption.

ISO Compliance: A Game-Changer for Crypto Adoption

According to Hilton, XLM’s ISO compliance places it in a prime position for integration with global financial institutions. ISO 20022 is the international standard for electronic data exchange between financial entities, and assets like XLM and XRP that meet these standards are likely to be prioritized by banks and governments looking to adopt blockchain technology.

Hilton pointed out that legislation such as the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) and the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act are laying the regulatory foundation for mass adoption.

XLM Holders! You need to know this! Very important. pic.twitter.com/HkKDFCuXQG

— Austin Hilton (@austinahilton) July 17, 2025

While acknowledging the complexities of the legislative process, he emphasized that the direction is clear: the groundwork is being set for blockchain-based systems to integrate with traditional finance, and ISO-compliant cryptos like XLM are at the center of this transformation.

Why XLM Is Poised for Growth

Hilton emphasized that owning XLM now means being early to a major shift. He explained that XLM isn’t just another crypto, it’s a foundational piece of a future financial system. As more institutions seek blockchain solutions that check all regulatory boxes, XLM’s compliance status gives it a strong advantage.

He also noted the rising importance of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), another fast-growing sector in which ISO-compliant blockchains could play a critical role. In his view, assets like XLM, XRP, Algorand (ALGO), Hedera (HBAR), and XDC form a strong foundation for a diversified crypto portfolio focused on long-term institutional relevance.

We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023

Technical Indicators and Recent Gains

Hilton referenced a recent buy alert from his team’s proprietary X1 Algo trading tool, which signaled a bullish entry on XLM 14 days ago. Since then, XLM has rallied over 110%, confirming the indicator’s accuracy and underscoring the momentum building around the asset. “If you had invested $1,000, you’d be up $1,100 in profit,” he said, encouraging viewers to consider both the fundamentals and technicals when evaluating XLM’s potential.

Current Price and Market Outlook

As of report time, XLM is trading at $0.4669. With a market capitalization of approximately $14.5 billion, XLM currently ranks number 12 among all cryptocurrencies. Its strong rebound aligns with a broader resurgence in digital assets, particularly those tied to financial infrastructure and compliance.

The Stellar network continues to gain relevance through real-world partnerships, such as with MoneyGram and Circle, enhancing its role in cross-border payments and decentralized finance (DeFi).

In conclusion, Austin Hilton’s message is clear: XLM is not just a speculative asset, it’s a strategic investment in the future of regulated blockchain finance. As institutions and governments move toward blockchain integration, ISO-compliant cryptos like XLM are likely to lead the way. For holders and potential investors alike, staying informed and understanding the bigger picture could make all the difference in the coming market cycle.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

The post XLM Holders, You Need to Know This, Very Important appeared first on Times Tabloid.