Ripple CLO Slams Outgoing SEC Chair Gensler’s Latest Action

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, recently criticized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its continued litigation against cryptocurrency companies, specifically in its ongoing case against Binance.

His remarks on Twitter highlighted the SEC’s filing of an 81-page brief containing recycled arguments, including the assertion that cryptocurrency lacks inherent value—a claim Alderoty called “absurd and unsupported.”

Calls for Clearer Regulation and Modernized Frameworks

This comment comes amid growing scrutiny of SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s enforcement approach to crypto regulation. Critics argue that the SEC prioritizes aggressive litigation rather than fostering a clear and balanced regulatory framework.

Alderoty has repeatedly underscored the need for regulatory clarity, emphasizing that the SEC’s reliance on outdated interpretations of the Howey Test fails to adequately address the uniqueness of digital assets.

John Deaton, a prominent crypto lawyer, echoed Alderoty’s sentiment, referencing the Howey Test to demonstrate the irrelevance of intrinsic value in determining whether an asset constitutes a security. Deaton questioned the SEC’s interpretation and suggested that such arguments undermine the credibility of its legal filings.

Observers within the cryptocurrency community, such as Nomad_XRP, have framed the SEC’s actions as a hindrance to innovation. They argue that while the SEC’s lawsuits create temporary market disruptions, they have allowed some investors to accumulate assets like XRP at lower prices, providing a silver lining amid regulatory uncertainty.

Broader Implications for the Cryptocurrency Industry

The SEC’s strategy under Gensler has faced broader criticism for its lack of clarity and consistency. The Commission’s cases against companies such as Binance, Coinbase, and Ripple highlight its expansive application of securities laws, which many view as an overreach.

Notably, Judge Analisa Torres’ ruling in the Ripple case last year delivered a mixed outcome, affirming that XRP was not inherently a security but finding certain institutional sales by Ripple in violation of securities laws.

This ongoing debate underscores the critical need for modernized regulatory frameworks tailored to the digital asset industry. As the SEC continues its enforcement actions, legal challenges from firms like Ripple are expected to shape the future of crypto regulation, potentially forcing greater accountability and clarity from U.S. regulatory bodies.

Whether Gensler’s approach will withstand judicial scrutiny or catalyze calls for legislative reform remains to be seen. However, the persistent criticisms from industry leaders like Alderoty highlight the growing tension between innovation and regulation in the crypto space.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

---

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News