Ripple CEO Says DOGE Has No Use Case, Dogecoin Founder Responds

At the recent Consensus 2024 conference, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse reiterated his critical stance towards Dogecoin, the leading meme coin. His comments highlight an ongoing debate within the cryptocurrency industry regarding the role of meme coins like Dogecoin compared to projects focused on utility.

Garlinghouse Calls for Industry Focus on Utility

While discussing the long-term outlook for the cryptocurrency industry, Garlinghouse emphasized the need for its evolution beyond purely speculative investments. He argued that the industry’s success over the next decade hinges on the development of practical applications and solutions.

“For me, the 10-year prediction has to be about utility and not speculation; it should be about solving real problems,” stated Garlinghouse.

Read Also: Dogecoin Creator Reveals Who Wrote Most of DOGE Code, As Elon Musk Slams Jackson Palmer for Zero Contribution

Dogecoin Scrutinized for Lack of Use Case

To illustrate his point, Garlinghouse specifically addressed Dogecoin, acknowledging its significant market capitalization exceeding $23 billion despite lacking a clear use case. He conceded that his criticism would likely spark debate from Dogecoin enthusiasts but maintained his position.

“I don’t think Dogecoin has been a good thing for the industry,” Garlinghouse remarked. “And I’m not anti Dogecoin but I don’t know what the use case is.”

He contrasted Dogecoin’s perceived lack of utility with other cryptocurrency projects actively tackling real-world issues within the financial sector. This highlights the growing emphasis within the industry on projects that demonstrably provide value.

This is not the first time Garlinghouse has publicly questioned Dogecoin’s value. In January 2024, at the World Economic Forum, he criticized meme coins in general, specifically mentioning Dogecoin as an example of a project lacking purpose.

Dogecoin Founder Defends Project

In response to Garlinghouse’s comments, Dogecoin co-founder Billy Markus has consistently defended the project. He argues that critics often fail to understand Dogecoin’s role within the crypto ecosystem. Notably, Markus emphasizes the similarities between Dogecoin and Bitcoin, suggesting the primary difference lies in their respective ticker symbols.

“It’s like saying you prefer the Euro but think the Yen is useless,” Markus stated metaphorically.

Market Context and Continued Relevance

It is important to consider the broader market context when evaluating these arguments. Dogecoin currently ranks among the top ten cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, placing it just behind Ripple’s digital asset, XRP, which is used for facilitating cross-border transactions. Additionally, Dogecoin has gained mainstream recognition through its acceptance as a payment method for Tesla merchandise.

Read Also: Why This $127 Million Shiba Inu (SHIB) Is A Trend Decider

The ongoing debate between Garlinghouse and Markus reflects the evolving nature of the cryptocurrency industry. While the long-term viability of meme coins like Dogecoin remains a topic of discussion, their current market presence and dedicated community cannot be ignored.

The industry is likely to continue its journey towards increased adoption and real-world applications, with both utility-focused projects and established meme coins vying for a place in the future of crypto.

---

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News