Ripple and XRP Face Uncertainty Following LBRY-SEC Case Judgment

The long-awaited ruling in the LBRY case concluded yesterday, leaving Ripple and the XRP community in a state of uncertainty. The court decision, issued on July 11, resolved the case between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and LBRY Inc., a decentralized content-sharing platform.

The LBRY team took to Twitter to announce the final ruling, revealing their compliance with the court order to fully dissolve LBRY Inc. They emphasized that the future of LBRY now rests in the hands of the community. However, this ruling has raised concerns about its potential impact on Ripple and the digital asset, XRP.

Read Also: Ex-SEC Director: It’s Reasonable for Judge Torres to Lock Ripple’s XRP Escrow Permanently

Lawyer Jeremy Hogan, well-known for his involvement in the XRP community, shared his insights on the LBRY case and its possible implications for Ripple. He highlighted that the LBRY court ruling did not address secondary sales or the Major Questions Doctrine. Instead, it primarily focused on halting further violations and issuing a penalty.

Ripple and XRP Face Uncertainty as LBRY Judgment Sets Precedent

The recent LBRY case ruling has left Ripple and the XRP community on edge as they await their own judgment. On Tuesday, July 11, the court reached a decision in the case involving LBRY Inc., a decentralized content-sharing platform, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

LBRY announced the final ruling on Twitter, stating that they will fully dissolve LBRY Inc. as per the court order. They emphasized that the fate of LBRY now rests in the hands of the community. However, this ruling has raised concerns about its potential impact on Ripple and the digital asset XRP.

Lawyer Jeremy Hogan, who is closely associated with the XRP community, shared his insights on the LBRY case and its implications for Ripple. He noted that the LBRY court ruling did not address secondary sales or the Major Questions Doctrine. Instead, it focused on halting further violations and imposing penalties.

Read Also: Analyst Says Lawsuit Against Ripple Executives is As Good As Lost. Here’s why

Hogan suggested that a similar outcome is possible in the ongoing Ripple case, but he outlined two crucial conditions. First, the court would need to determine that the Fair Notice Defense is insufficient to warrant a trial. Second, the court would have to establish that both past and present sales of XRP qualify as investment contracts.

“In conclusion, this ruling (and indeed this case) provides little market guidance and has “protected” no one. In fact, it hurt ALL the people involved. It’s just another feather in the SEC hat. That’s all,” Jeremy Hogan said.

Conclusion

The LBRY case ruling has set a precedent for the ongoing SEC case against Ripple. The outcome of the Ripple case is still uncertain, but the LBRY ruling suggests that the SEC may be successful in its case. The Ripple community is anxiously awaiting their own judgment, hoping for clarity and a favorable outcome.

---

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News