In digital asset markets, such as the Ripple (XRP) community, it is common for participants to expect visible efforts aimed at stimulating price appreciation. Promotional campaigns, public optimism, and constant market commentary often shape perceptions of progress.
A recent explanation shared by community analyst Arthur offers a different interpretation of XRP’s trajectory, one that rejects the assumption that price action should be an immediate priority. Instead, the focus is placed on how XRP is positioned within payment and liquidity systems, where function takes precedence over valuation.
Arthur’s position rests on the idea that Ripple’s work is not centered on influencing market sentiment. Rather than attempting to elevate price through messaging or hype, Ripple is presented as concentrating on making XRP useful within real financial processes.
This distinction is critical to understanding why XRP does not behave like many speculative assets that rely on attention to sustain momentum.
🚨 NO BULLSHIT !
A lot of people ask why Ripple never tries to “pump” XRP.Honest answer:
👉 Ripple is not working for the price.
👉 Ripple is working for usage.
XRP is not treated as a marketing product, but as liquidity infrastructure.
Infrastructure doesn’t pump.
It gets…— Arthur (@XrpArthur) December 28, 2025
Ripple’s Focus on Usage and Liquidity
According to the analysis, Ripple treats XRP as a tool designed to facilitate liquidity rather than as a product to be marketed for price appreciation. Liquidity infrastructure, by its nature, tends to operate quietly in the background.
Its relevance becomes apparent only when it is required to solve concrete problems, such as reducing friction in cross-border transactions or enabling efficient value transfer between systems.
Arthur explains that infrastructure does not experience gradual promotional-driven appreciation. Instead, it is often overlooked until adoption reaches a point where usage is no longer optional.
At that stage, demand emerges from necessity, not expectation. In this context, XRP’s valuation would adjust because certain participants must acquire and use it, not because they anticipate gains.
Why This Is Difficult for Retail Holders
This approach can be difficult for retail participants to accept. Many investors are accustomed to assets that respond quickly to narratives, announcements, or social media activity.
XRP’s slower, utility-focused path can appear unrewarding during extended periods of muted price movement. Arthur acknowledges this frustration but argues that it is consistent with how infrastructure assets historically behave.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
When usage finally becomes entrenched, repricing tends to be abrupt rather than incremental. The lack of constant excitement may obscure progress, but it also sets the conditions for sharp valuation shifts once XRP becomes rooted in operational workflows.
Utility as the Driver of Repricing
Echoing this view, another market participant, LadyP, emphasized that XRP’s distinguishing feature lies in its capacity to support efficient value transfer. She described XRP as playing a role in enabling a connected financial environment where value moves with speed and reliability.
In her assessment, meaningful repricing would follow demonstrated utility, not precede it. Taken together, these perspectives frame XRP as a long-term infrastructure-oriented asset.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
