XRP investors who expect every major Ripple announcement to produce an immediate price increase may need to reconsider how they view the company’s long-term strategy.
Wealth strategist Arthur clearly stated in a tweet that Ripple executives Brad Garlinghouse and Monica Long are primarily focused on developing global payment infrastructure rather than managing XRP’s market price.
🚨 Hard truth for the XRP community.
Brad Garlinghouse and Monica Long don’t wake up every morning thinking about your portfolio.
They’re building a global payment infrastructure. Competing with legacy systems. Settling trillions. Moving capital across borders in seconds.…— Arthur (@XrpArthur) August 5, 2026
Arthur Says Ripple’s Mission Extends Beyond XRP’s Price
Arthur explained what he considers the central objective of Ripple’s leadership. He said Garlinghouse and Long do not begin each day focused on the performance of individual XRP holders’ portfolios.
Instead, he said their work centers on building global payment infrastructure, competing with traditional financial systems, settling large volumes of transactions and enabling capital to move across borders more efficiently.
According to Arthur, XRP’s price should be viewed as a potential consequence of that development rather than Ripple’s primary objective. He suggested that investors can become disappointed when major announcements fail to produce an immediate price increase because they measure progress through short-term market movements.
Arthur encouraged the XRP community to view Ripple as an infrastructure-focused company working toward a larger financial objective. He said investors should approach XRP as an infrastructure investment rather than as an asset that must continuously produce short-term price gains.
He also emphasized that his comments do not constitute financial advice and described the post as educational.
Commenters Question XRP’s Value Accrual
One commenter, OptimaPs, largely agreed with Arthur but added that investors can still connect Ripple’s long-term goals with their own interests.
The commenter said that agreeing with Ripple’s vision does not mean investors must share the company’s timeline. However, they maintained that Ripple’s success and the interests of XRP holders can remain closely connected, similar to how investors evaluate companies in traditional markets.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Another commenter, Alew, agreed with Arthur “for the most part” but raised concerns about Ripple’s transparency toward XRP investors. The commenter said investors are justified in demanding clearer information about how Ripple’s business activities could create value for XRP itself.
Alew compared Ripple’s approach with other blockchain projects, specifically mentioning Canton Network and its CEO Yuval Rooz as examples of what the commenter considers more regular communication about token value accrual.
The commenter also questioned Ripple’s emphasis on RLUSD and other business initiatives, arguing that some recent developments appear more directly beneficial to Ripple as a company than to XRP. Alew said investors should focus on clear tokenomics and understand how value generated by Ripple’s expanding business could reach the XRP token.
Arthur’s post therefore presents a straightforward distinction between Ripple’s corporate mission and XRP’s market performance. His position is that investors should evaluate the infrastructure Ripple is building instead of expecting every announcement to trigger a price increase.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
