According to a Fox Business report, Grayscale, a prominent player in cryptocurrency investment, has launched the first-ever U.S. XRP Trust, aimed at accredited investors.
This initiative provides direct exposure to XRP, marking another step forward in expanding institutional investment opportunities within the digital asset space. The move comes amid growing interest in XRP despite regulatory uncertainty.
Although a trust and an exchange-traded fund (ETF) serve different purposes, the launch of a trust is often seen as an early-stage product offering. Trusts are typically available only to accredited investors, whereas ETFs are accessible to the general public, subject to approval by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Grayscale has outlined a four-phase product lifecycle for its XRP trust, leaving room for the potential conversion into an XRP ETF, pending regulatory developments. Such a transformation would broaden access to XRP investments by allowing retail investors to participate, but it would require SEC approval.
Grayscale is no stranger to pioneering crypto investment products. The company made headlines after successfully challenging the SEC in 2023, a decision that allowed it to convert its Bitcoin trust into a spot Bitcoin ETF.
This ruling set a significant precedent in the crypto industry, leading to a surge of Bitcoin ETF applications from major Wall Street firms such as BlackRock, Fidelity, and Wisdom Tree. The debut of several Bitcoin ETFs on Wall Street marked a key milestone, further legitimizing cryptocurrency as a viable asset class for traditional financial markets.
XRP supporters are hopeful that the launch of a similar ETF for their asset is on the horizon. The success of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs has demonstrated a strong demand for crypto-based financial products, and many believe that XRP’s inclusion could further advance institutional acceptance of digital currencies.
However, the path to an XRP ETF is complicated by ongoing legal disputes between Ripple and the SEC, which have cast a shadow over the asset’s regulatory status.
The SEC first filed a lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020, accusing the company of conducting unregistered securities sales by offering XRP to institutional investors.
While a court ruled in favor of Ripple in a partial victory, stating that XRP sales to retail investors do not qualify as securities, the issue remains unresolved as the SEC has signaled plans to appeal the decision. This ongoing legal battle creates uncertainty around the token’s future, particularly for regulatory approval for investment products like ETFs.
Despite these challenges, Grayscale remains bullish on XRP’s long-term potential. The company has highlighted the asset’s role in facilitating efficient cross-border payments and modernizing financial systems.
XRP’s utility within Ripple’s payment solutions and its partnerships with financial institutions worldwide have positioned it as a key player in the blockchain and fintech space.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
An anonymous crypto analyst , renowned for his accurate predictions, has made a massive price…
Price predictions are increasingly becoming an intrinsic feature in the crypto landscape, and a famous…
In 2014, Ethereum’s Initial Coin Offering (ICO) took the world of cryptocurrency by storm, raising…
Shiba Inu is experiencing a surge in market activity, capturing attention with approximately 17 trillion…
Crypto chartist CryptoAmsterdam recently advised Shiba Inu (SHIB) investors to view every price dip as…
David Schwartz, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, recently highlighted significant distinctions between contracts and “reasonable reliance,”…