A recent comparison between XRP’s price history and the early trajectory of major technology companies has renewed debate about investor expectations. The argument suggests that many XRP holders may be becoming discouraged too quickly, even as the asset continues to lag despite significant institutional involvement.
Revisiting Amazon’s Long-Term Growth Pattern
The discussion gained momentum after market analyst 24hrscrypto1 referenced the growth of Amazon’s stock price during its early years.
He pointed to data showing that Amazon traded at only $0.09 in the late 1990s before gradually rising to more than $229 over an extended period. According to the figures he shared, this represents a cumulative increase exceeding 250,000%.
The analyst emphasized that Amazon did not immediately gain widespread recognition and spent many years in periods of slow movement before registering major gains. He argued that this timeline demonstrates how large returns often require sustained patience, especially in sectors that involve new technologies or emerging markets.
Everyone crying that “XRP is taking forever” needs to look at this chart and breathe for a second…
Amazon was $0.09 in 1997 and nobody cared…
Nobody understood it
Nobody had the patiencePeople want Amazon level returns…
…but with microwave level patience. pic.twitter.com/tcsAsssGZa
— 𝟸𝟺𝙷𝚁𝚂𝙲𝚁𝚈𝙿𝚃𝙾 (@24hrscrypto1) December 8, 2025
Growing Concerns Inside the XRP Community
The comparison surfaced amid increasing frustration among XRP holders. The asset has experienced slow momentum even as several major developments have unfolded.
Ripple allocated $2.5 billion this year toward various initiatives, and XRP-focused exchange-traded funds reportedly accumulated close to $1 billion in their first month of activity. Despite these notable events, XRP’s price has fallen by more than 26% over the past two months.
The extended consolidation has led many investors to express concern about XRP’s performance relative to other digital assets. According to 24hrscrypto1, the dissatisfaction reflects a broader trend in which many traders expect substantial gains within short periods but are reluctant to endure lengthy phases of limited price action.
He argued that this mindset overlooks how long it can take for underlying technologies to develop and for market participants to fully appreciate their value.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Mixed Reactions From Market Observers
The comparison to Amazon drew varied responses. Some commentators stated that the analogy does not hold up when reviewing long-term charts. One user, Mortimer, argued that Amazon’s price history shows steady progression over time, whereas XRP’s chart displays frequent stagnation across multiple years. He contended that the patterns are fundamentally different.
In response, 24hrscrypto1 said that the appearance of Amazon’s growth curve is influenced by hindsight. He suggested that looking at Amazon’s early chart without knowledge of its future success would show slow progress similar to what XRP is currently experiencing. He maintained that XRP may still be in the early stages of realizing its potential.
Another participant noted that, historically, XRP’s appreciation from its lowest recorded levels to its past highs still reflects strong lifetime gains. Even so, some analysts argue that the asset may have already passed its most significant growth phase.
While some community members use Amazon’s history to support optimistic projections for XRP, others cautioned that equating a cryptocurrency with a longstanding corporation can lead to unrealistic assumptions.
One critic pointed out that Amazon’s value is linked to a business producing revenue, while XRP functions as a digital asset without the same type of financial foundation. He warned that drawing parallels between the two may encourage misplaced confidence.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
