In a heated House hearing, US House Majority Whip Tom Emmer scrutinized SEC Chair Gary Gensler for his mode of handling digital asset regulation, highlighting a series of alleged missteps and lawlessness within the SEC. Emmer’s remarks focused particularly on the SEC’s conduct in the Debt Box case, calling into question Gensler’s leadership and integrity.
Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett shared the news on X, with a notable quote from Emmer. He said, “We could not have had a more destructive or lawless chairman of the SEC.”
The SEC’s Problems
Emmer began by emphasizing that effective leadership starts from the top, implicitly criticizing Gensler’s approach. He accused Gensler of fostering a culture of political allegiance within the SEC, citing emails that suggested a preference for hiring individuals aligned with his political views.
According to Emmer, this has led to a work environment where loyalty to the chair outweighs adherence to the law and the SEC’s mission. Notably, top Republican lawmakers recently launched an investigation into Gensler’s hiring practices.
Emmer also highlighted the Debt Box Case. He asserted that the SEC acted unlawfully by materially misrepresenting facts to a court, an unprecedented action in the SEC’s history. Emmer noted that the SEC was sanctioned and ordered to pay nearly $2 million in legal fees, a cost borne by taxpayers.
Emmer expressed his disbelief that no senior SEC officials were held accountable for the misconduct in the Debt Box case, stating, “The SEC broke the law, your attorneys lied to the court, and no one in your leadership here in D.C. has been held accountable.” This lack of accountability, according to Emmer, shows a broader pattern of mismanagement and lawlessness within the agency.
We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023
The “Crypto Asset Security” Debacle
Emmer also criticized Gensler’s broader regulatory approach to digital assets. He argued that Gensler has failed to provide clear regulatory guidelines, instead opting for a heavy-handed enforcement approach, creating confusion in the marketplace.
He criticized Gensler for coining the term “crypto asset security,” which has no statutory basis, and using it to justify enforcement actions against digital asset firms. Emmer also referenced Vice President Harris’s desire to craft clearer rules for digital assets, noting this as a rebuke of Gensler’s performance.
Is This Good for XRP?
For XRP and other digital assets currently under scrutiny by the SEC, Emmer’s condemnation of Gensler’s approach may signal a shift in congressional attitudes towards more supportive regulatory frameworks. It also proves that Ripple’s years of arguments against the SEC’s approach were right, and Gensler might finally face the consequences the crypto community has been calling for.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
