In an environment where digital assets are often judged by speculation rather than structure, Jake Claver, a prominent business leader and financial strategist, has issued a direct and uncompromising assessment of XRP and the XRP Ledger.
Rather than focusing on price targets or market sentiment, Claver centered his message on what he described as facts about the network’s design and capabilities, presenting a case rooted in infrastructure and long-term utility.
Claver emphasized that XRP operates on a decentralized network, highlighting that no single entity controls the ledger. He also pointed to its deflationary nature, explaining that a small amount of XRP is permanently removed from circulation with each transaction, a mechanism built into the protocol from the beginning. While the effect is gradual, he describes it as a structural feature that differentiates XRP from inflationary systems.
No matter what anyone says, facts don’t change:
XRP is decentralized
XRP is deflationary
The XRPL has a built-in DEX (first launched in 2012)
The XRPL supports tokens, stablecoins, and RWAs (first blockchain to introduce tokenization)
The XRPL’s features are native to the L1…— Jake Claver, QFOP (@beyond_broke) December 24, 2025
Built-In Features of the XRP Ledger
A central part of Claver’s message focused on the XRP Ledger itself. He noted that the XRPL has included a built-in decentralized exchange since 2012, making it one of the earliest blockchains to offer native trading functionality at the base layer. According to his view, this early design choice demonstrated an intent to support real-world financial activity rather than experimental use cases.
He further underlined that the XRPL supports the issuance and transfer of tokens, stablecoins, and real-world assets, describing it as the first blockchain to introduce tokenization at this level.
Claver stressed that these capabilities are native to the ledger’s Layer 1 architecture, not dependent on external smart contracts. In his assessment, this reduces exposure to risks commonly associated with contract vulnerabilities, wallet drains, and blind signing, which have affected other ecosystems.
Liquidity and Market Structure Considerations
While Claver’s post focused on fundamentals, responses from other X users added a market perspective. One commenter, known as GCIslander, acknowledged the potential upside for XRP but argued that price appreciation must align with liquidity realities.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
He suggested that reaching double-digit prices would require substantial volumes of XRP to be locked through mechanisms such as exchange-traded fund creations and corridor demand. In his view, rapid moves toward much higher price levels in the near term would strain spreads, routing efficiency, and hedging systems across markets.
Facts Versus Interpretation
Claver concluded his message by drawing a clear line between opinion and what he described as reality, asserting that the characteristics he outlined are factual elements of the XRPL’s design.
The varied reactions that followed illustrate how those same features can be interpreted differently, depending on whether the focus is on protocol structure, market mechanics, or long-term economic impact. Together, the exchange reflects the ongoing effort within the digital asset space to balance technological fundamentals with practical financial considerations.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
