From traders debating whether XRP really bottomed at $1.40 to analysts wrestling with messy exchange anomalies, there’s a growing hunger for clarity in crypto charting. In that spirit, a shift toward cleaner, more defensible data standards may be the next frontier in credible XRP analysis.
The Problem: Distortion in Exchange-Level Price Feeds
Individual exchange charts regularly diverge — especially during flash crashes, exchange-specific outages, or wash-trade spikes. A single anomalous tick on one platform can throw off trendlines, misstate support zones, or mislead stop placements. Because major exchanges tend to dominate volume, their quirks disproportionately sway perception.
What looks like a bounce or breakdown on Binance might not appear on a composite. Institutional charting tools mitigate this by using exchange-averaged prices, but retail traders frequently chart off a single feed — and thus inherit distortion risk.
Egrag Crypto’s New Standard: The “Crypto Data Set” Approach
To counter these inconsistencies, Egrag Crypto announced adopting a unified “Crypto Data Set” for all future XRP analysis. This is an averaged data series across major exchanges, intended to dilute exchange-specific noise.
Crucially, Egrag also declared that until further notice, he will omit Binance, Bitstamp, Poloniex, and Coinbase—arguing that perceived manipulative activity on those venues warps chart shape.
#XRP – Chart and Data Distortion ⁉️‼️ :
The below post is created to find the best chart to use for a long-term view of #XRP from now on. So far, we’ve seen distortions in the data, and I want to keep things clear without too many conflicting numbers.
From now on, I’ll only… pic.twitter.com/XCIPvwcrQ3
— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) October 14, 2025
From that filtered series, Egrag now accepts $1.40 as the operative low going forward, rejecting lower prints that appeared in excluded feeds. (Egrag Crypto is credited as the source of this methodology change.)
By anchoring to that $1.40 baseline in the filtered series, Egrag aims to standardize trend analysis, Fibonacci levels, and long-range support zones in a less volatile frame.
Costs, Caveats & Comparative Impact
Excluding high-volume names like Binance or Coinbase is not trivial. It reshapes the averaged trend line: peaks and troughs may shift, volatility is often lower, and volume weighting becomes heavier on smaller venues. Analysts must understand that Egrag’s $1.40 “low” is conditional on their methodological filter—not a universal market truth.
From a publication ethics perspective, every chart Egrag issues must disclose its exclusion criteria and the rationale. Readers should also have access to a “full-market” counterpart so they can evaluate what’s being edited out.
Moreover, exclusion risks under-represent liquidity sources. If real capital is flowing through Binance, omitting it may blind the reader to key momentum. The integrity of an average depends critically on exchange inclusion logic.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Supporting Research: Network Dynamics & Data Aggregation
Beyond exchange-level arbitrage, researchers have explored how XRP’s underlying transaction network correlates with price moves. The correlation tensor method, for instance, embeds weekly XRP transactions as directed graphs and studies how the evolution of singular values relates to price behavior. Some results show strong negative correlations in bubble phases.
In the 2024 study of arbitrage impacts, researchers demonstrated that cross-exchange price divergences alter the strength of that correlation: during bubble periods, anti-correlation between price and the largest singular value is amplified. This supports the idea that data aggregation decisions and exchange inclusion affect not just chart shape but deeper structural signals.
In the context of XRP’s network topology itself, the overlay has a core backbone and high node turnover. Fewer than half of the nodes persist across five-day windows, making the network highly dynamic. Such structural volatility further argues for smoothing and aggregation when visualizing price.
Meanwhile, in broader crypto markets, aggregation methodologies are under scrutiny. A 2025 SSRN paper on “Aggregate Confusion in Crypto Market Data” lays out how poorly designed aggregation may inadvertently amplify bias or distort trend signals.
How to Read & Use Egrag’s Charts Going Forward
First, treat the $1.40 baseline as a method-dependent anchor, not an oracle. Always cross-reference it against full, unfiltered market charts. Second, check the metadata: which exchanges were included or excluded, for what reason, and whether volume weighting was applied.
Third, consider maintaining your own parallel charts—one full and one filtered—to triangulate meaningful divergences. Fourth, interpret trendlines, support zones, and volume patterns in light of the possibility that large venues may be masked or omitted.
Egrag Crypto’s shift is not a claim about XRP’s true bottom, but a methodological discipline. In a crypto market rife with noise, that kind of discipline is precisely what gives charts — and convictions — greater durability.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
