Friday, November 28, 2025
HomeCryptocurrencyUphold CEO: As a Matter of Law, XRP Was Not a Security

Uphold CEO: As a Matter of Law, XRP Was Not a Security

When the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Ripple Labs in December 2020, nearly every major American exchange delisted XRP. Uphold Inc. stood apart. The global trading platform stood out by continuing to offer XRP to customers despite the legal battle.

A newly shared video on X by ALLINCRYPTO captures Chief Executive Officer Simon McLoughlin explaining why Uphold made that choice and why, years later, he feels “very proud and vindicated.”

Uphold’s Legal Rationale

McLoughlin said the decision was grounded in a simple principle: the courts had not yet ruled on XRP’s legal status. “As a matter of law, XRP was not a security,” he stated, recalling that when the SEC first filed its complaint, “it had not been adjudicated upon,” so Uphold concluded “the right thing to do was to continue to support XRP until the courts had [ruled] upon it.” 

The company held firm against delisting pressure, prioritizing due process over following industry trends.

SEC’s Stance and Market Impact

The CEO noted that the SEC never directly ordered the removal of XRP from trading platforms. “All of the U.S. exchanges had delisted XRP and effectively caused detriment to U.S. consumers,” he noted, yet “the SEC said we never asked [them] to,” a development he believes “vindicated our stance.” 

By continuing to offer XRP, Uphold preserved market access for customers who would otherwise have been sidelined during a critical period.

Court Rulings Confirm the View

Legal developments have since validated Uphold’s approach. In July 2023, U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that while certain institutional sales of XRP qualified as securities transactions, sales on public exchanges did not. 

After a failed settlement attempt, both the SEC and Ripple withdrew their appeals in August 2025, leaving intact the court’s finding that secondary-market sales of XRP are not securities. For McLoughlin, this outcome confirms the reasoning that guided Uphold’s original decision.

A Stand for Due Process

Looking back, McLoughlin emphasized the satisfaction of staying the course. “We’re very proud and feel vindicated that we did support it for those two years,” he said, adding that it was “very gratifying this year to see the U.S. courts basically reject the majority of the SEC’s complaints against Ripple.”

By standing firm, Uphold illustrates how exchanges can harmonize regulatory diligence with customer needs. By refusing to delist until a final judgment, the company demonstrated confidence in the legal system and in XRP’s status—proving, as McLoughlin told ALLINCRYPTO, that “as a matter of law… XRP was not a security.”

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

Zaccheaus Ogunjobi
Zaccheaus Ogunjobi
I am a passionate and experienced writer with a strong focus on cryptocurrency and the financial landscape. With a keen eye for market trends and emerging financial technologies, I strive to deliver insightful, well-researched content that educates and informs. Whether breaking down complex financial concepts or analyzing the latest market movements, my goal is to make finance accessible and engaging for a wide audience.
RELATED ARTICLES

Latest News & Articles

Cookie Settings #SEVIO sevio.com, 151feb19-cd9f-42ee-8dca-236d4fdceddb, DIRECT #Google google.com, pub-2134012267069721, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0