A provocative theory shared by XRP proponent Edo Farina has stirred debate in the crypto space. According to Farina, Ripple Labs, the company behind the XRP token, may not be just a private fintech enterprise but a possible extension of U.S. intelligence infrastructure. He supports this claim by highlighting corporate trademark histories, overlapping personnel, and early domain registrations tied to Ripple Communications and OpenCoin.
A Trademark Trail from 1991
The foundation of Farina’s argument lies in trademark records. “Ripple Communications, Inc.” was incorporated in Nevada on March 21, 1991—17 years before Bitcoin’s white paper. Public records show that Ripple Labs, Inc., the entity known today for developing XRP, currently holds the trademark originally belonging to Ripple Communications. That trademark was transferred through OpenCoin, Inc.—Ripple Labs’ former name before rebranding.
This raises an immediate question: why would a crypto startup inherit trademarks and branding from a 1991 telecom company? While the connection could appear coincidental, Farina insists it hints at a deeper institutional lineage.
🧵RIPPLE IS A U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY. $XRP
The truth behind @Ripple, INSA, and intelligence contractors , and why Ryan Fugger is the key.
Ryan Fugger claims the name “Ripple” came from a Grateful Dead song.
But the real story? It traces back to U.S. intelligence ties, secret… pic.twitter.com/yyQTmBmD9q
— EDO FARINA 🅧 XRP (@edward_farina) July 7, 2025
Early Digital Footprints and INSA Overlap
According to Farina, three key domains—RipplePay, RippleCom, and OpenCoin—were all launched in 2005, reportedly hosted under the same IP block. This was also the year the Intelligence and National Security Alliance (INSA) underwent reorganization. Farina suggests that this timeline convergence indicates the quiet development of a broader intelligence-linked fintech infrastructure.
Supporting this idea is the involvement of Karen Nussle, listed as a principal at Ripple Communications. The uploaded image shows that she was also listed as a press contact at INSA, using an “@insaonline.org” email address. This strongly suggests a crossover between Ripple Communications and the U.S. intelligence policy space.
We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023
Suzanne Heckenberg and the Disappearing Entity
Another key figure cited is Suzanne Wilson Heckenberg, now President of INSA. According to INSA’s website, she served as Vice President of Marketing for Ripple Communications from September 2010 to October 2012. Her departure coincided with a significant transition: that same month, Ripple.com was acquired, and the Ripple Communications trademark changed hands, eventually ending up under Ripple Labs.
After this point, Ripple Communications seemingly disappeared from public records. To Farina, the sequence is too aligned to ignore. He suggests Ripple Communications may have acted as a shell company or soft-launch vehicle for a government-aligned financial infrastructure, later consolidated under Ripple Labs.
What Happened to Ryan Fugger?
Farina also casts doubt on the official story surrounding Ryan Fugger, the original mind behind RipplePay. Fugger once claimed that the name “Ripple” was inspired by a Grateful Dead song. But if Ripple Communications predates his work by over a decade, and already held the trademark, Farina argues that Fugger’s explanation may have been a public narrative masking institutional involvement. Fugger’s quiet exit from the project only fuels further suspicion.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
