Crypto researcher Dominique Esposito has proposed a different way to evaluate XRP’s long-term investment thesis, arguing that the focus should shift beyond the idea that XRP could replace SWIFT.
In a detailed post, Esposito pointed to publicly available documents and developments across Ripple’s institutional business, the XRP Ledger (XRPL), RLUSD, and the emerging native lending infrastructure as evidence of a potentially broader financial ecosystem.
Ripple’s Expanding Institutional Infrastructure
Esposito says Ripple has developed beyond its original focus on payments and is now building across payments, custody, RLUSD, treasury services, prime and markets, tokenization, and institutional capital markets.
According to the researcher, recent investments and initiatives have specifically referenced tokenized assets, settlement, and collateral mobility on the XRPL. Esposito sees these developments as important because they could connect Ripple’s institutional infrastructure directly with activity on the XRPL.
The post then highlighted RLUSD, noting that Ripple’s independently attested transparency information recently showed approximately $1.87 billion in circulation and around $1.98 billion in reserve funds. Esposito also noted that the stablecoin’s issuer operates under the New York Department of Financial Services.
The researcher described RLUSD as increasingly significant regulated financial infrastructure within the broader ecosystem.
🧵1/ I think the XRP thesis has changed — and much of the evidence is hidden in plain sight in public documents.
Forget “XRP will replace SWIFT” for a moment.
Something potentially much bigger is being built:
Ripple institutional stack
↓
XRPL
↓
RLUSD
↓
XRP liquidity
↓
XRP…— Dominique Esposito (@AtlasPs402) August 29, 2026
XLS-66 and Native XRP Lending
Esposito identified XLS-66 as one of the most important developments to monitor. The proposed XRPL Lending Protocol introduces a structure involving Single Asset Vaults, Loan Brokers, and borrowers using fixed-term loans with interest and first-loss protection.
The researcher emphasized that the model is designed to incorporate professional, off-chain underwriting rather than relying solely on anonymous crypto lending.
Esposito also noted that XRPL documentation states that Single Asset Vaults can hold XRP. Private vaults can restrict participation through Credentials and Permissioned Domains, potentially allowing verified capital to enter XRP-based lending structures.
The post linked this architecture with potential institutional users identified by Ripple, including payment providers requiring short-duration liquidity, market makers financing inventory, treasury teams deploying idle digital assets, and structured-credit lenders.
The Potential Role of XRP Treasury Strategies
Esposito also highlighted Evernorth and its XRP treasury strategy, arguing that the initiative deserves closer examination because it involves active deployment rather than simply holding XRP.
The researcher further cited a recent SEC filing identifying Ripple Labs as the sole member of Pathfinder Digital Assets LLC. Esposito used this information along with other developments to outline a potential institutional structure involving an XRP treasury, XRPL-based vaults, institutional borrowers, and market-making or collateral activity.
Under this framework, XRP could potentially move from being held as an asset to being used as productive institutional capital that generates interest or supports liquidity.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Esposito Emphasizes What Remains Unproven
Despite presenting the potential thesis, Esposito stressed that the final stage has not yet been demonstrated. The researcher noted that LendingProtocolV1_1 remains under development and said there is no evidence yet of hundreds of millions of XRP already moving through native institutional loans.
Esposito therefore identified protocol activation, the first institutional XRP vault, measurable XRP deposits, named borrowers, market-making or collateral usage, and disclosed interest or yield as developments that could demonstrate actual XRP demand.
Esposito’s central point is that the evidence should be tested, not assumed. For Esposito, the key question is whether the existing architecture eventually produces measurable institutional demand for XRP.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
